Charlottesville Footnote

James Dunphy notes:

A 20 year old named James Alex Fields, Jr. rammed his Dodge Challenger into a group of people during the Charlottesville March this past Saturday, August 12, 2017, killing one. The interesting thing is that if he had been a Muslim doing it for the sake of jihad, the media and academia would in response be promoting a narrative that we should not allow this attack to be used to malign Muslims across the nation because most Muslims, according to them, are law-abiding people of good will.

Posted in Anti-White, MSM | Comments Off on Charlottesville Footnote

Bill the Butcher

We need Bill the Butcher to speak to the Cucks regarding their virtue-signaling of displeasure with Trump’s Charlottesville response:

“I know your works. You are neither cold nor hot. So because you are lukewarm, I will spew you out of my mouth. You can build your filthy world without me. I took the father. Now I’ll take the son. You tell young Vallon I’m gonna paint Paradise Square with his blood. Two coats. I’ll festoon my bedchamber with his guts. As for you, Mr. Tammany-f*cking-Hall, you come down to the Points again, and you’ll be dispatched by my own hand. Get back to your celebration and let me eat in peace.”

Posted in Alt-Right | Comments Off on Bill the Butcher

Can Europe Be Saved?

In Commentary, Sohrab Ahmari reviews The Strange Death of Europe by Douglas Murray:

The book deals mainly with Western Europe’s disastrous experiment in admitting huge numbers of Muslim immigrants without bothering to assimilate them. These immigrants now inhabit parallel communities on the outskirts of most major cities. They reject mainstream values and not infrequently go boom. Murray’s account ranges from the postwar guest-worker programs to the 2015 crisis that brought more than a million people from the Middle East and Africa.

This is dark-night-of-the-soul stuff. The author, a director at London’s Henry Jackson Society (where I was briefly a nonresident fellow), has for more than a decade been among Europe’s more pessimistic voices on immigration. My classically liberal instincts primed me to oppose him at every turn. Time and again, I found myself conceding that, indeed, he has a point. This is in large part because I have been living in and reporting on Europe for nearly four years. Events of the period have vindicated Murray’s bleak vision and confounded his critics…

Posted in Death of the West, Europe, Immigration | Comments Off on Can Europe Be Saved?

Emboldened

A newly-emboldened, rainbow coalition of SJWs toppled a Confederate statue in Durham, NC today, while chanting “You can’t stop the Revolution!”

UPDATE: This is astonishing:

When protesters, angry over the deadly incidents in Virginia this weekend, decided to take down a nearly century-old statue of a Confederate soldier in North Carolina on Monday, law enforcement stood back and watched.

At no time did officers with the Durham Police Department or deputies with the Durham County Sheriff’s Office intervene as activists brought a ladder up to the statue and used a rope to pull it down, according to multiple media reports.

No one was arrested.

Why is it that whenever Antifa leftists are in the vicinity, law enforcement is given stand-down orders?

UPDATE II: The fat black lesbian SJW who climbed the Confederate Soldiers Monument in Durham NC has been arrested. She/It/Ze is 22 year old Takiya Fatima Thompson:

“I’m tired of white supremacy keeping its foot on my neck and the necks of people who look like me,” Thompson said at a news conference. “That statue glorifies the conditions that oppressed people live in, and it had to go.”

Thompson, a student at historically black North Carolina Central University, faces vandalism misdemeanor and felony charges, including for property damage and participation in a riot, according to the Durham County Sheriff’s Office.

Posted in Anti-White, Cultural Marxism, Left | Comments Off on Emboldened

Respect Pronouns

Posted in Identity Politics, Political Correctness | Comments Off on Respect Pronouns

The Liberal Crackup

In the WSJ, Mark Lilla (himself a liberal) writes of “The Liberal Crackup”:

For those students who will soon become liberal and progressive elites, the line between self-discovery and political action has become blurred. Their political commitments are genuine but are circumscribed by the confines of their self-definitions. Issues that penetrate those confines take on looming importance, and since politics for them is personal, their positions tend to be absolutist and nonnegotiable. Those issues that don’t touch on their identities or affect people like themselves are hardly perceived. And classic liberal ideas like citizenship, solidarity and the common good have little meaning for them.

As a teacher, I am increasingly struck by a difference between my conservative and progressive students. Contrary to the stereotype, the conservatives are far more likely to connect their engagements to a set of political ideas and principles. Young people on the left are much more inclined to say that they are engaged in politics as an X, concerned about other Xs and those issues touching on X-ness. And they are less and less comfortable with debate.

Over the past decade a new, and very revealing, locution has drifted from our universities into the media mainstream: Speaking as an X…This is not an anodyne phrase. It sets up a wall against any questions that come from a non-X perspective. Classroom conversations that once might have begun, I think A, and here is my argument, now take the form, Speaking as an X, I am offended that you claim B. What replaces argument, then, are taboos against unfamiliar ideas and contrary opinions.

Posted in Left, Political Correctness | Comments Off on The Liberal Crackup

NYT: “Far-Right Groups Surge Into National View in Charlottesville”

The NYT has a piece titled “Far-Right Groups Surge Into National View in Charlottesville” by Richard Fausset and Alan Feuer (with Sheryl Gay Stolberg, Hawes Spencer and Alan Blinder contributing reporting):

Will the overt displays of racism return the extreme right-wing to the margins of politics, or will they serve to normalize the movement, allowing it to weave itself deeper into the national conversation?

There’s the obligatory photo of a 1488-er doing the Roman salute. Then, there’s a steady stream of the usual:

Some left-leaning Charlottesville organizers like Laura Goldblatt, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Virginia, said that the full airing of such ideas would eventually lead more Americans to reject them…

But Ms. Goldblatt, while not addressing those leftists who resorted to violence, said that some kind of response in the street was necessary. History, she said, has shown that “ignoring white supremacy, in terms of shutting your doors and not coming out to confront them, has been a really dangerous strategy.”

Yes, the timeworn “history has shown” excuse: an all purpose phrase (all the more ‘powerful’ when uttered by a leftwing Jew) that serves to shut down free speech as well as excuse leftwing-intitiated violence against a peaceful and lawful white identitarian gathering. (BTW, that last paragraph is essentially the full extent of the piece’s analysis of Antifa-initiated violence.)

And then there’s Heidi from the $PLC:

Heidi Beirich

Heidi Beirich, who runs the intelligence project at the Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors far-right groups, was among those who watched with alarm as the online excitement over the gathering grew. “It was astounding to see it go from 100 people saying they were going to go, to 300, to 500, to 700, to raising money on online platforms to facilitate that,” she said.

Heidi was so anxious about it, she ate a dozen sweet babkas to calm herself down.

And let’s toss in the equally alarmist Larry Rosenthal (whom I once watched on C-SPAN deliver a vile characterization of Trump voters):

Lawrence Rosenthal, the executive director of the Berkeley Center for Right-Wing Studies at the University of California, said that Mr. Spencer appeared to welcome this level of violent, street-level politics.

I’m sure Berkeley is in the planning stages for a ‘Berkeley Center for Left-Wing Studies’, to be helmed by conservative WASPS.

He noted an audio recording Mr. Spencer made after similar skirmishes in April in Berkeley. Mr. Spencer called them a “pitched battle” between two polarized, political “vanguards” that reminded him of political upheavals, presumably in Germany, that took place in the 1920s and 1930s.

“This is a very different dynamic than I’m used to,” Mr. Spencer said. “I thought that political violence had just become impossible, that we’d never see it again.”

It’s always 1933 with these people.

Posted in Alt-Right, Jewish, White Identity | Comments Off on NYT: “Far-Right Groups Surge Into National View in Charlottesville”

Jean Sibelius – Symphony No. 7 (1924)

From Wikipedia:

Symphony No. 7 in C major, Op. 105, was the final published symphony of the Finnish composer, Jean Sibelius. Completed in 1924, Symphony No. 7 is notable for being a one-movement symphony, in contrast to the standard symphonic formula of four movements…

The form of the symphony is startlingly original. Since the time of Joseph Haydn, a movement in a symphony would typically be unified by an approximately constant tempo and would attain variety by use of contrasting themes in different keys. Sibelius turned this scheme on its head. The symphony is unified by the key of C (every significant passage in the work is in C major or C minor), and variety is achieved by an almost constantly changing tempo, as well as by contrasts of mode, articulation and texture….

Although the symphony apparently first existed in embryonic form in D major, it eventually attained the home key of C major. There was a time when composing in C was considered fruitless—it had “nothing more to offer”. But in response to this symphony, the British composer Ralph Vaughan Williams said that only Sibelius could make C major sound completely fresh. Peter Franklin, writing of the Seventh in the Segerstam–Chandos cycle of Sibelius symphonies, calls the dramatic conclusion “the grandest celebration of C major there ever was.”

An interesting factoid that may serve to contrast the Aryan vs. Semitic aesthetic sensibility:

[Sibelius’] later works are remarkable for their sense of unbroken development, progressing by means of thematic permutations and derivations. The completeness and organic feel of this synthesis has prompted some to suggest that Sibelius began his works with a finished statement and worked backwards, although analyses showing these predominantly three- and four-note cells and melodic fragments as they are developed and expanded into the larger “themes” effectively prove the opposite.

This self-contained structure stood in stark contrast to the symphonic style of Gustav Mahler, Sibelius’s primary rival in symphonic composition. While thematic variation played a major role in the works of both composers, Mahler’s style made use of disjunct, abruptly changing and contrasting themes, while Sibelius sought to slowly transform thematic elements. In November 1907 Mahler undertook a conducting tour of Finland, and the two composers were able to take a lengthy walk together, leading Sibelius to comment:

I said that I admired [the symphony’s] severity of style and the profound logic that created an inner connection between all the motifs … Mahler’s opinion was just the reverse. “No, a symphony must be like the world. It must embrace everything.”

Posted in Music | Comments Off on Jean Sibelius – Symphony No. 7 (1924)

Red Ice Hacked

In the immediate aftermath of Charlottesville, Red Ice TV, a media platform that does great indispensable work, has been hacked (via a very high level of hacking skills).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWF5i0qvf3Q&feature=youtu.be

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Red Ice Hacked

Iris Apfel

I happened to be flipping through the channels the other night and came across a PBS POV series episode called Iris, about Iris Apfel. From the PBS page is this synopsis:

Iris pairs the late documentarian Albert Maysles (Grey Gardens, Gimme Shelter), then 87, with Iris Apfel, the quick-witted, flamboyantly dressed 93-year-old style maven who has had an outsized presence on the New York fashion scene for decades. More than a fashion film, the documentary is a story about creativity and how a soaring free spirit continues to inspire. Iris portrays a singular woman whose enthusiasm for fashion, art and people are her sustenance. She reminds us that dressing — and indeed, life — is nothing but a grand experiment. “If you’re lucky enough to do something you love, everything else follows.”

Apfel is a walking stereotype of the gaudy Park Avenue Jew, and if watching this documentary leaves you with one lasting word or image, it might be: gaudiness.

Physically, Apfel is a not an attractive woman, her Semitic features most pronounced with her advanced age, and her requisite whiney Jew accent and constant state of anxiety conjuring an image of Woody Allen in drag.

Her husband appears as a sort of devoted stooge, an equally stereotypical NY Jew who serves as unfunny comic relief. He also serves the role of cuckholded mannequin for Iris, regularly tasked with displaying his wife’s awful style. We see him in a wheelchair, wearing bright pants covered with a floral pattern, or wearing a bright red baseball cap embroidered with what seems to be two fistfuls of marble-sized gold studs.

In one sequence early in the film, we see a gay black fashion designer pushing Apfel in a wheelchair as he takes her into a tiny, hole-in-the-wall, clothing and accessory shop in Harlem. Apfel praises the African styles of Harlem, the gaudy colors and clunky jewelry being tribal styles she herself has quite successfully ‘culturally appropriated’ into pastiche from the very blacks she now deifies or otherwise employs as maids, drivers, or assistants. Despite being fantastically wealthy — she lives in a 3-bedroom Park Avenue apartment and also has a black-housemaided apartment at Palm Beach Towers (where else) – we witness her haggle with the African-immigrant-accented, black shop owner relentlessly. And we’re talking about haggling a $10 bracelet (in traditional pan-African colors) down to $7, that sort of thing.

The theme of cultural appropriation and Jewish parasitism extends to Apfel’s initial foray into the vacuous world of ever-meta conspicuous consumption (aka ‘fashion’) where we learn she got her initial success from culturally appropriating medieval European tapestry designs and making them into wallpaper designs for wealthy New Yorkers. At one point in the film, there’s a moment of hilarious irony as Apfel bemoans the state of today’s younger designers, complaining how they don’t even stitch or make their own fabrics! And this is coming from a woman who essentially made a boatload of shekels by ripping off pre-existing styles. A second irony here is that the fashion mavens she bemoans are part of the logical trajectory of the vacuous fashion industry itself: an endpoint of pure marketed image, devoid of creative talent.

Whether it’s the fashion designer who can’t sow or the fabulously wealthy huckster who has underpaid assistants creating his ‘art’, locales like Manhattan are the epicenters of our contemporary, debased, neo-Weimarian era, and figures like Iris Apfel are among its grotesque and celebrated elder pioneers.

Full documentary:

Posted in Culture, Jewish | Comments Off on Iris Apfel