Roger Kimball on Tom Wolfe

Nobody strings together a sentence quite like Roger Kimball. Here he is discussing the late Tom Wolfe:

One thing that Wolfe’s extravagant style at first obscured was the deep conservatism of his world view, moral and political as well as aesthetic. All those exclamation points and eye-popping agglomerations of adjectives—to say nothing of his Beau Brummell–like taste in haberdashery (the inevitable white suits, the spats)—distracted early observers from his commitment to the canons of realism, on the one hand, and, on the other, his firm endorsement of the traditional social, political, and economic order—“middle-class values,” in fact—that had made the United States such a conspicuous oasis of prosperity and freedom.

Wolfe’s chief subject, in his novels as well as his essays and documentary efforts, was the baneful effects that regularly follow upon the transformation of moral ideas into imperative fashion accessories. In one sense, fashion inhabits a fluctuating and ephemeral realm. But its diktats can be tyrannical as well as peremptory. Counterpoised against the ground of traditional moral and aesthetic practice, the expostulations of fashion absolutized amount to what Wolfe once called “pernicious enlightenment,” which is to say the fake enlightenment of what we today call political correctness: that intoxicating emotion of virtue that follows on the conviction that one is traveling in the vanguard of history. The result is often comic, but also often appalling, not to say malicious. Wolfe was expert at rendering the tout ensemble…

Were Tom Wolfe starting out today, we suspect that he might find the path to success more arduous. There are a few reasons for this. For one thing, effective satire depends upon a clear and generally agreed-upon distance between satire and reality. As the moral and aesthetic pretensions of nihilism gobble up greater and greater precincts of cultural life, it becomes more and more difficult to distinguish reliably the one from the other. The line was already getting blurry in the 1960s, ’70s, and ’80s, when Wolfe was at his satirical apogee. Progress towards terminal fatuousness has continued apace and has made the satirist’s job more difficult. What common values, after all, can he confidently appeal to in framing his gibes?..

Tom Wolfe was a literary treasure and a sly if undeclared culture warrior on the side of civilization. There might be a place for him still as a writer of genius. As a polemicist, alas, he is too high-octane to pass muster in our timid, querulous, and self-asphyxiating age.

Posted in Culture | Comments Off on Roger Kimball on Tom Wolfe

The Ballad of David Irving

Ron Unz’s “The Remarkable Historiography of David Irving” is a must-read and yet another object lesson for the need to question everything. Every grand sweeping narrative you take for granted (e.g., “Winston Churchill is a hero!”) must be, to use a favorite phrase of the Left, interrogated.

I must confess I had no idea of the widespread praise Irving, as a WWII historian, has received from other renowned historians of the first order. I’ve only known the libel that Irving is a ‘Holocaust denier’ and a crank.

But Irving’s books have received superlative praise from the likes of Hugh Trevor-Roper and Raul Hilberg, among others. Sir John Keegan, whose opinions of specific Irving theses naturally vacillated, nonetheless wrote that Irving “knows more than anyone alive about the German side of the Second World War”, and claimed that Irving’s book Hitler’s War was “indispensable to anyone seeking to understand the war in the round.” In the Times Literary Supplement, Keegan also wrote that “Two books in English stand out from the vast literature of the Second World War: Chester Wilmot’s The Struggle for Europe, published in 1952 and David Irving’s Hitler’s War”.

Also, little did I know that Kevin MacDonald testified at the infamous Irving trial.

Irving has made all of his books available in PDF format (for free) at his website.

Here is a taste of Irving’s tenacious, firsthand investigations and attention to detail:

https://youtu.be/CPiOTC6Nyvk

As far as Irving being a ‘Holocaust denier’:

https://youtu.be/SH47MeOyWV0

Below is an instructive debate between Eric Breindel of The NY Post and the great Christopher Hitchens, who at the time had just written a Vanity Fair piece slamming St. Martin’s Press for reneging on David Irving’s book contract for a Joseph Goebbels biography. If nothing else, this video illustrates how the NYC publishing world operates, and why certain books (e.g., Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together) do not get published in the U.S.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdxTsWXZdFc&feature=youtu.be

I only watched the first 15 min of the following, but it stands as a fitting video precursor of Irving’s planned autobiography. His has been a most interesting life:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1qVwQsn2NY

Posted in Cultural Marxism, History, Jewish | Comments Off on The Ballad of David Irving

The Unband – Geez Louise (2000)

Posted in Music | Comments Off on The Unband – Geez Louise (2000)

Dowd on BO’s “Ahead of My Time” Comment

I have been perplexed by what Zero meant when he said to Ben Rhodes: “Sometimes I wonder whether I was 10 or 20 years too early”.

A pretty good explanation comes, of all places, from Maureen Dowd:

As president, Obama always found us wanting. We were constantly disappointing him. He would tell us the right thing to do and then sigh and purse his lips when his instructions were not followed.

Shortly after Donald Trump was elected, Rhodes writes in his new book, “The World as It Is,” Obama asked his aides, “What if we were wrong?”

But in his next breath, the president made it clear that what he meant was: What if we were wrong in being so right? What if we were too good for these people?

“Maybe we pushed too far,” the president continued. “Maybe people just want to fall back into their tribe.”

So really, he’s not acknowledging any flaws but simply wondering if we were even more benighted than he thought. He’s saying that, sadly, we were not enlightened enough for the momentous changes wrought by the smartest people in the world — or even evolved enough for the first African-American president.

“Sometimes I wonder whether I was 10 or 20 years too early,” Obama mused to aides.

We just weren’t ready for his amazing awesomeness.

When someone who was as Obama-obsessed as Maureen Dowd says this about you, your legacy may be on very shaky ground indeed.

Posted in Democrat Party | Comments Off on Dowd on BO’s “Ahead of My Time” Comment

NYT: Being a Housewife is Tantamount to White Supremacy

I thought, per the NYT & others, that the Alt Right was ‘dead’. Why, then, the need for hit pieces every other day? I see the frequency of such pieces as a fairly reliable gauge of how healthy the Alt Right in fact is and how worried The Cathedral is increasingly getting. Culture may be changing in a direction they do not like.

This recent one (“The Housewives of White Supremacy”) is written by Annie Kelly, “a Ph.D. student at the University of East Anglia researching the impact of digital cultures on anti-feminism and the far-right.”

I can’t figure out the m.o. From one pov, op-eds like this provide the AR with free publicity, the best that money could otherwise buy. I mean, they quote The Golden One, for cryin’ out loud, as well as some tradwife bloggers who are “what could be mistaken for a peculiar style of mommy-vlogging is a virulent strain of white nationalism.”

What struck me about this piece, however, is the barely disguised hostility for absolutely everything tradwives represent:

And yet between cute pastoral anecdotes of growing her own vegetables and making banana bread, it soon becomes clear that Ms. Jorgenson is advocating something sinister — not just a return to agrarian motherhood.

She lived in Germany temporarily, she says, but left just before “an influx of refugees took over the country.” She just had a child and thinks the new baby is beautiful — but maybe not quite in the same way all mothers do: “I always wanted children that looked like me,” she says, “blond-haired, blue-eyed babies, but I kind of had to say it under my breath.”

Wanting to continue your bloodline (if you are a gentile white, that is) is equated with something sinister. More overt hostility from elsewhere in the piece:

The seemingly anachronistic way they dress is no accident. The deliberately hyperfeminine aesthetics are constructed precisely to mask the authoritarianism of their ideology…

So, again, if the AR is dead, why the need for valuable, coveted NYT op-ed space dedicated to profiling aspects of it?

Still, tradwives remain worth contemplating because they help illuminate some of the forces that drive the alt-right and where the movement might be going. The alt-right is abhorrent; it is racist and hate-filled. But it is, like any other mass movement, also driven by a sense of dissatisfaction with modern life…

When I began studying digital anti-feminist and far-right networks for my doctorate in 2015, the number of women in these spaces seemed small enough to be insignificant. There has since been such a surfeit of women beginning careers off such networks, many infusing their particular brand of far-right ideology with “trad” rhetoric, that it now seems irresponsible not to think about them, their roles and what they reveal. The material conditions that allow far-right movements to thrive seem unlikely to change, and feminism’s work is far from done in countering the kind of sexual anxieties that the alt-right exploits. Tradwives may seem like a lunatic fringe at present, but they may not stay one for long.

To the NYT, being a ‘tradwife’ is part of the lunatic fringe. Let that sink in.

The AR is not dying. It is expanding and adjusting to the social realities of doxing and deplatforming.

And it is why we will continue to see streams of articles and op-eds delivering the equivalent of dire warnings about Neo-Nazis behind every tree.

Posted in Alt-Right, Culture Wars, NYT | Comments Off on NYT: Being a Housewife is Tantamount to White Supremacy

Felix Yz

Felix Yz is a book designed to normalize and condition children (age range: 10-14) into accepting transgenderism, pronoun creativity, and further, outer reaches of ‘gender identity’:

When Felix Yz was three years old, a hyperintelligent fourth-dimensional being became fused inside him after one of his father’s science experiments went terribly wrong. The creature is friendly, but Felix—now thirteen—won’t be able to grow to adulthood while they’re still melded together. So a risky Procedure is planned to separate them . . . but it may end up killing them both instead.

This book is Felix’s secret blog, a chronicle of the days leading up to the Procedure. Some days it’s business as usual—time with his close-knit family, run-ins with a bully at school, anxiety about his crush. But life becomes more out of the ordinary with the arrival of an Estonian chess Grandmaster, the revelation of family secrets, and a train-hopping journey. When it all might be over in a few days, what matters most?

Told in an unforgettable voice full of heart and humor, Felix Yz is a groundbreaking story about how we are all separate, but all connected too.

Library Journal gushes:

Most notable among the supporting cast is his gender-fluid grandparent Grandy, who alternates among male, female, and no presentation depending on the day of the week. Grandy’s presence allows for an explanation of choosing one’s own pronouns (here: vo, ven, veir, veirs, veirself) and offers, along with the biracial Hector, more ways for Felix to better understand how all people contain multitudes.

  • An NPR Best Book of 2017!
  • A Kirkus Reviews Best Book of 2017!
  • A VOYA Top Shelf pick for 2017!
  • An ALA 2018 Rainbow List Top Ten pick!

About the book’s author:

Lisa Bunker

Lisa Bunker has written stories all her life. Before setting up shop as a full-time author and trans activist she had a 30-year career in non-commercial broadcasting, most recently as Program Director of the community radio station in Portland, Maine. Besides Maine she has made homes in New Mexico, southern California, Seattle, and the Florida panhandle. She currently lives in Exeter, New Hampshire with her partner and her cat. She has two grown children. When not writing she reads, plays piano, knits, takes long walks, does yoga, and studies languages. She is not as good at chess as she would like to be, but still plays anyway. Her author website is at www.lisabunker.net, and you can find her on Twitter @LisaBunker.

Lisa Bunker is a transgendered ‘woman’:

I would say my status as a transgender person is one facet, among many, of who I am. Of course it matters, it’s had a big impact on my life and the arc of my life, but it doesn’t define me. You can’t say, oh, Lisa Bunker, she’s trans, and have that explain me any more than my faith, or my nationality, or how tall I am, or the color of my eyes, or anything else.

So yes, writing stories featuring LGBTQ characters without that being the main point, and without shaking a figure and lecturing at the reader or anybody else. It’s just a thing about Felix, and his grandparent is genderqueer, and his mother is bisexual, and there are a couple of other LGBTQ characters as well in this story…

For my little family of three, myself and my two children, and my partner two, so I am a transgender woman, I am engaged to be married to another woman. I have two children, one of whom is genderqueer, doesn’t identify as either male or female and uses the pronouns they or them, and then I have my son who is the only cisgender heterosexual person, our token straight kid.

This is how it happens, how Culture changes to Weimar 2.0. Books like this (intended for children) are authored, published, then gushed over and promoted by liberal culture-influencers. By the time Boomer conservatives (and conservative parents) are aware of it, it is too late to provide a counter-narrative.

And there is no counter-narrative, not in the form of a children’s book. Such a book would be a Hate Book, written by a Nazi who is literally Hitler.

Posted in Cultural Marxism, Culture Wars | Comments Off on Felix Yz

NYT: “Beyond My White Sydney Bubble”

In “Beyond My White Sydney Bubble”, Lisa Pryor offers a maudlin paean to Multiculturalism:

SYDNEY, Australia — I have spent most of my life among the mostly white and Australian-born. But slowly over the last few years I have been moving beyond the comfort of my own ethnic group…

We are living multiculturalism, muddling through it. It is not perfect, but it is glorious and I would never go back. I have come to believe Anglo-Celtic Australia needs to work harder to integrate into this new mainstream…

Within this syrupy idealism, however, are a couple of rather strange passages. In virtue signaling her embrace of The Other, Pryor writes:

I have discovered that it is possible to arrange evening social events that are not centered on alcohol, unthinkable among white Australians. I have discovered other night lives in my city that I have not been a part of before, like chocolate cafes and karaoke lounges.

If all your friends are alcoholics or semi-alcoholics, then maybe you need to get new friends. Drinking is not a sign of ‘whiteness’. But a nice wine does compliment all those exotic and vibrantly diverse restaurants!

Then comes the strangest ‘defense’ of whiteness (?) I’ve yet encountered:

But I’ve also learned to stand up for, and explain, my culture. I remember a conversation about premarital sex. “Excuse me, that is part of my culture,” I said. My mother would have been horrified if I married someone without first having sex with that person.

C’mon NYT, can’t you come up with better “white people suck” op-eds than this?

Posted in Culture Wars, NYT | Comments Off on NYT: “Beyond My White Sydney Bubble”

The New Yorker Interviews Two Starbucks Employees Who Took the Training

The New Yorker sends an intrepid reporter to report back on how the StarbucKKKs racism training session went (“What Two Starbucks Employees Made of the Company’s Ant-Bias Training”). He interviews two baristas with the company. They appear to be a representative cross-segment of the avg Starbucks employee and (possibly) customer:

The first, a barista in his sixties, who asked not to be named, described himself as “a white Jewish guy, living in a very blue town in a very blue state,” by which he meant Massachusetts. “I’m fascinated by the idea that all eight thousand stores are getting the same four-hour training,” he said, before heading in to the store where he’s worked for five years, a place mostly patronized, he said, by “older Jewish regulars.”…

The second employee I spoke to was Jaime Prater, a forty-two-year-old Starbucks shift manager in Los Angeles, who identifies as biracial and gay

If places as progressive as this are full of invisible racism, just imagine how risible the rest of the country is.

The Jew Barista appears to have flunked the course:

The barista couldn’t think of an instance, during his Starbucks tenure, when he’d acted with bias, he said…

He added, “Do I know that I have bias? Absolutely. But I’m very conscious and aware of ethical stuff.”

He recalled a phrase repeated often during the training, “Become ‘color brave.’ ” He said, “I still don’t know what that means, exactly, to be honest.”

It means to be a wide open canvas, upon which POCs and corporate HR SJWs shall paint whatever they want.

The Gay Biracial Barista (named Prater) seems to have been more properly conditioned, but then again, he may have an unfair advantage, sorta like SAT questions with a cultural context that favors whites:

“Race is always on my mind, being biracial…”

Prater also acknowledged his own biases, such as when “I might have an issue with Jane Doe Caucasian Lady walking down the street, assuming she’s entitled.”

I’m pretty sure throwing around epithets like ‘Jane Doe Caucasian Lady’ is something the anti-racism class is designed to put an end to. But then again, maybe the opposite is true.

Both baristas feel that heightening their Extrasensory Anti-Bias Perception ought to come with a pay raise:

Prater thought that Starbucks deserved credit for “rolling out the red carpet and spending millions on training technology, paperwork, books, and all of these things.” But he still felt ambivalence, for other reasons. “The lowest-paid workers are taxed with giving the best face of the company, when no loyalty, no guaranteed hours are given to them,” he said. He added, “Even though it’s a really great first step, it’s a big ask for a taxed workforce: to tell people doing five things at once, at the lowest end of the totem pole, to also be extra racially sensitive. It almost seems unfair to me.”

On this, Prater and the barista in Massachusetts agreed. “When you’ve got a line of customers out the door,” the latter said, “how do you deal with whatever incident may be happening in the store at a given moment? It’s all a free-flowing theatrical event you’re trying to manage.”

Indeed! When there’s a long line of irate customers waiting for their triple mocha soy latte, who can be expected to simultaneously gauge when one particular customer you just asked “would you like some room for cream?” took this as an invasive, penetrative, racial slight?

Finally, there was this hoot:

There were transitional segments narrated by the rapper Common. “A number of people said, ‘What’s the deal with Common?’ ” the Massachusetts barista told me. “I know who he is, but I couldn’t tell you anything he’s done.”

I can tell you what he’s done: gotten free P.R.

Posted in Cultural Marxism, Political Correctness | Comments Off on The New Yorker Interviews Two Starbucks Employees Who Took the Training

NYT’s Racism Confessionals

Hopefully, the NYT can make this into a regular series, so liberal whites can atone endlessly, and to ever deeper and greater levels (“9 People Reveal a Time They Racially Stereotyped a Stranger”):

Years ago, I was at the local park with my little son. He’d thrown his toy into the large pond. As I contemplated how I might retrieve it and still keep my son safe, a group of young black men approached us, dressed in durags, baggy pants and dreads.

My son and I were on the ground and the young men stood over and around us. I didn’t immediately assume we were in any danger, but I did wonder what was going on, since they were intentionally engaging with us.

I consciously did not flinch because I think a lot about racism and I don’t want to be that person. Instead, I smiled at them and said hello.

Short of possessing perfect information about an individual’s intentions, heuristics is in play. The presence of durags, baggy pants and dreads (in conjunction with skin color) serve as a complex nexus of information-bearing traits, which then guides a person’s decision-making. (Were the person above to have noticed a group of black men dressed in khakis or suits, they probably would have been a lot less tense and anxious.)

Naturally, the above story has a happy ending:

Then, one of the young men smiled back and asked if I would like them to retrieve the toy.

I was very touched and of course said, “Yes, please!” They linked hands and reached out into the pond and got the toy.

I had to dab my eyes with a Kleenex on that one.

Now, this above story could have ended in a very different way, in which case the NYT would avoid reporting on it like the plague. (See Derb’s “The Talk”.)

Maybe Jessie Jackson can email in his own sin in this regard:

“There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps… then turn around and see somebody white and feel relieved.”

I wonder why there are no stories of people sinfully stereotyping, say, an Asian person as a potential criminal?

Posted in NYT, Race | Comments Off on NYT’s Racism Confessionals

First Look at “First Reformed” (2018)

Is Paul Schrader’s “First Reformed” an SJW fantasy, a critique of SJW-ness’ telos, a parody of SJW-ness, or some strange combination thereof? Schrader himself has always struck me as a conservative guy, or at a minimum not a PC guy.

From the sounds of it, “First Reformed” appears to be a further riff on themes Schrader explored in his screenplay for “Taxi Driver” (which was directed by Martin Scorcese.)

In “First Reformed”, Ethan Hawke’s Reverend Toller comes to identify himself with radical environmentalism and antinatalism:

The movie, which stars Ethan Hawke as an upstate New York minister who is undergoing a crisis of faith/health/isolation/midlife woe, is an austerely unabashed and compelling oddball, a pastiche of “Diary of a Country Priest” and “Winter Light” and what you might call the Schrader Paradigm, the one derived from “The Searchers” that he used (and made iconic) in his screenplay for “Taxi Driver,” and then in “Hardcore” and “Light Sleeper”: the loner who goes down a blood trail of redemption, trying to rescue a ravaged maiden who was taken by the forces of sin but remains, in his mind, unspoiled.

That said, there’s an additional component to “First Reformed” that, I think, accounts for some of the cartwheels that critics have done over it. The picture is a gravely absorbing cinematic-spiritual journey, but it’s also a message movie about environmental catastrophe in which the hero, emerging from his dour despair, begins to find a purpose in becoming radicalized. He gooses himself awake, and by the time the film reaches its nutty inspired climax, this somberly cautious and reflective man is flirting with strapping on a suicide vest. For a lot of indie-film buffs who consider themselves social justice warriors, that’s close to a feel-good ending…

He views himself as an enlightened activist, but he’s also a messianic narcissist who has figured out a way to make climate change all about him.

I’m looking forward to checking this film out.

Posted in Film | Comments Off on First Look at “First Reformed” (2018)