I have to laugh when I see a piece in National Review by Ian Tuttle titled “The Racist Moral Rot at the Heart of the Alt-Right”, and then see a piece in Slate titled “How National Review Helped Build the Alt-Right” by one Osita Nwanevu (whom I’m going to take a wild guess is non-white.) The byline of the latter reads: “The magazine laid the foundations for the movement it now opposes.”
Nwanevu is correct in one respect: the dastardly ‘Alt-Right’ of today is basically conventional wisdom in pre-1965 National Review, albeit updated with post-1965 evidence regarding HBD and demographic upheaval.
