Ronan v Trump

My favorite passage from Ronan Farrow’s new piece on Trump in The New Yorker (which MSNBC and CNN will be discussing for the next 2,000 hours straight):

Afterward, McDougal wrote, she “went to see him every time he was in LA (which was a lot).” Trump, she said, always stayed in the same bungalow at the Beverly Hills Hotel and ordered the same meal—steak and mashed potatoes—and never drank.

Posted in Republican Party | Comments Off on Ronan v Trump

The Art Of Reading In The Digital Era

In “Teaching The Art Of Reading In The Digital Era”, James McWilliams discusses the amplified cognitive experience of reading when a physical book’s tactility and smell is in play…. compared to a Kindle:

“Reading,” says Steve Mannheimer, professor of Media Arts and Science at Indiana University, “doesn’t occur without some fairly specific and concrete combination of physical objects, environment, and purpose.” So one technique is to focus on the book as a book. “Intuitively, I would say that the paper book invites far more physical manipulation with at least the fingers and hands,” he says. “All that finger/hand fidgeting is part of the cognitive process, or at least reinforces the cognitive process of reading.”

There’s other evidence that a traditional book, rather than an electronic tablet, makes for a more engaged reading experience. During research for a paper published in 2014, Anne Mangen, a cognitive psychologist at the University of Stavanger in Norway, compared the reading experience of iPad users and paper traditionalists reading the same material. She found that readers felt less transported by the writing and less able to resist distractions when reading on an iPad than on paper. “When you read on paper you can sense with your fingers a pile of pages on the left growing, and shrinking on the right,” she told the Guardian. Such a “tactile sense of progress,” she suggested, helps readers better follow the storyline.

In a review paper, Australian scholars Stewart Todhunter and Penny de Byl argue that “the ability to touch and smell a book has an innate power, engaging readers in a way not yet possible through pure digitized versions of the same media.” They write that the “human perception of tangibility” is directly linked to the production of knowledge, a connection that originates in an infant’s ability to mentally grasp objects not available for immediate observation. “Although it is possible to touch an ebook,” they write, “the interactivity does not endow the same effect” as an actual book. The fact that “it is not the actual book itself being touched but the device on which it resides” is a distinction that, when it comes to forming reading habits, matters.

The reason for this difference may come down to what the scholars Jim Gerlach and Peter Buxmann call “haptic dissonance”: an alienation from the book as physical book. To better understand this phenomenon, the researchers surveyed avid readers—people who read, on average, 30 books a year—and had them imagine reading a hardcover book and on an e-reader. The study found that 93.3 percent identified “the feel of a page and the paper” and 80 percent identified “the feel of turning a page” as important aspects of reading. When they turned to the e-readers, 56.7 percent explicitly “miss[ed] the paper while turning the pages” while a third reported that, “while holding the book, I can’t feel the progress I’ve made.” Summarizing the research on “the reading brain in the digital age,” Ferris Jabr writes in Scientific American, “evidence from laboratory experiments, polls and consumer reports indicates that modern screens and e-readers fail to adequately recreate certain tactile experiences of reading on paper that many people miss and, more importantly, prevent people from navigating long texts in an intuitive and satisfying way.”

Another thing electronic books cannot provide is something that many reading experts believe is essential for creating an environment conducive to lifelong reading: a room filled with actual books. Lisa Sumner, an English teacher at Bluffton High School in Bluffton, South Carolina, considers it her “life’s work” to be “guiding people to read rigorously.” When we speak about her classroom strategies, she stresses, more than any other factor, the importance of having “a huge classroom library,” with physical books from floor to ceiling there to be grabbed, handled, smelled, shared, and browsed at will. “Being around books does something to people,” she says. “Being in a room where every wall is full of books is a visual reminder” that Sumner thinks is critical to becoming a “book person.”

I’m a late-to-the-game fan of the Kindle, primarily for its ability to store a near endless amount of books on such a small, portable device. The ability to read in low-light conditions, the very long battery life, the ability to change font size… All work towards cognitive enhancement in various situations.

But there is truly nothing like a physical book, and really nothing like a bookshelf filled with books. The pleasure I get from visiting used book stores is second to none.

Posted in Culture | Comments Off on The Art Of Reading In The Digital Era

First Things: “The Impossibility Of “Alt-Right Christianity””

Writing in First Things, Connor Grubaugh writes on “The Impossibility Of “Alt-Right Christianity””, which is largely a response to Hunter Wallace’s articulation of a race realist Christianity.

[T]hose who ascribe the achievements of Western culture to race rather than providence have chosen Faust over Christ.

Wallace declares that “race realism”—the unifying confession of the alt-right movement—is compatible with Christianity rightly understood… Only liberalized “modern Christianity” is “inherently incompatible with White identity.” The problem with American society, Wallace opines, is that Jews have “dethroned [Christianity] as the dominant culture” through “the universities and the mass media,” which they “hijacked” some time in “the early twentieth century.”…

In Wallace’s view, Christianity always follows the dominant culture. The mainline American churches once accepted slavery and segregation, but now they denounce them. They once rejected abortion, divorce, and homosexuality, but now they accept them. Wallace’s conclusion: “The churches accommodate and echo whatever is the political mainstream.” For the moment, they “are conforming to political correctness in condemning the Alt-Right as uniquely evil,” but in the long run, “the Alt-Right shouldn’t get hung up on being anti-Christian because Christianity is infinitely malleable.”

To Wallace’s quite lucid rationale, Grubaugh, in this brief piece, offers no convincing counterargument.

Posted in Alt-Right, Christianity | Comments Off on First Things: “The Impossibility Of “Alt-Right Christianity””

The Endless Night: A Valentine to Film Noir

As a film noir fanatic, I found this rather nice:

Set to the tune of Massive Attack’s “Angel,” Serena Bramble’s 2009 remix project “The Endless Night: A Valentine to Film Noir” is a “video love letter that distills film noir movies into their atmospheric essence.”

Films used in this remix project are below. The only two I haven’t seen yet are The Naked Kiss and Elevator to the Gallows.

The Letter (1940, William Wyler. Bette Davis)
The Maltese Falcon (1941, John Huston. Humphrey Bogart, Mary Astor)
Shadow Of A Doubt (1943, Alfred Hitchcock. Joseph Cotten)
Double Indemnity (1944, Billy Wilder. Barbara Stanwyck, Fred MacMurray)
Murder, My Sweet (1944, Edward Dmytryk. Dick Powell)
Scarlet Street (1945, Fritz Lang. Edward G. Robinson, Joan Bennett)
Laura (1945, Otto Preminger. Gene Tierney)
Detour (1945, Edgar G. Ulhmer. Ann Savage)
Notorious (1946, Alfred Hitchcock. Cary Grant, Ingrid Bergman)
Gilda (1946, Charles Vidor. Rita Hayworth)
The Killers (1946, Robert Siodmak. Ava Gardner, Burt Lancaster)
The Big Sleep (1946, Howard Hawks. Humphrey Bogart)
The Postman Always Rings Twice (1946, Tay Garnett. John Garfield, Lana Turner)
The Lady From Shanghai (1947, Orson Welles. Rita Hayworth, Welles)
Out Of The Past (1947, Jacques Tourneur. Jane Greer, Robert Mitchum)
Brute Force (1947, Jules Dassin. Burt Lancaster)
Force Of Evil (1948, Abraham Polonsky. John Garfield, Marie Windsor)
The Set-Up (1949, Robert Wise. Robert Ryan)
The Third Man (1949, Carol Reed. Orson Welles)
Criss Cross (1949, Siodmak. Burt Lancaster, Yvonne De Carlo)
Gun Crazy (1950, Joseph H. Lewis. John Dall, Peggy Cummins)
In A Lonely Place (1950, Nicholas Ray. Humphrey Bogart, Gloria Grahame)
The Asphalt Jungle (1950, Huston. Sterling Hayden)
Night And The City (1950, Jules Dassin. Richard Widmark, Gene Tierney)
Sunset Blvd. (1950, Billy Wilder. Gloria Swanson, William Holden)
Ace In The Hole (1951, Billy Wilder. Kirk Douglas, Jan Sterling)
Angel Face (1952, Otto Preminger. Jean Simmons)
Pickup On South Street (1953, Samuel Fuller. Richard Widmark)
The Big Heat (1953, Fritz Lang. Gloria Grahame, Lee Marvin)
Kiss Me Deadly (1955, Robert Aldrich. Gaby Rodgers)
Night Of The Hunter (1955, Charles Laughton. Robert Mitchum, Lillian Gish)
The Killing (1956, Stanley Kubrick. Sterling Hayden)
Elevator To The Gallows (1958, Louis Malle. Jeanne Moreau, Maurice Ronet)
Touch Of Evil (1958, Orson Welles)
The Naked Kiss (1964, Samuel Fuller. Constance Towers)

Posted in Film, Film Noir | Comments Off on The Endless Night: A Valentine to Film Noir

Reuters/Ipsos Poll: White Consciousness is Coalescing in the U.S.

Larry Sabato is rather alarmed at the results of a new Reuters/Ipsos poll (with a good sample size of 5,360). The poll’s full results and methodology are available here, with crosstabs available here.

Sabato writes:

A new Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in conjunction with the University of Virginia Center for Politics finds that while there is relatively little national endorsement of neo-Nazis and white supremacists, there are troubling levels of support for certain racially-charged ideas and attitudes frequently expressed by extremist groups…

Whoa!

[D]espite the events in Charlottesville and elsewhere, few people surveyed expressed direct support for hate groups. But on the other hand, it will be disturbing to many that a not insubstantial proportion of those polled demonstrated neutrality and indifference or, worse, expressed support for antiquated views on race.

“Disturbing”? “Antiquated views on race”?

Among the more interesting findings (Remember: this is a poll of all Americans, not just white Americans.):

  • 14% of all respondents both 1) agreed that white people are under attack and 2) disagreed with the statement that nonwhites are under attack.
  • 39% of respondents strongly or somewhat agreed with the statement that “white people are currently under attack in this country”.
  • 31% of respondents strongly or somewhat agreed that the country needs to “protect and preserve its White European heritage.”
  • 33% failed to express tolerance of interracial marriage.
  • 57% said that Confederate monuments should remain in public spaces.
  • A plurality of respondents were against BLM, with 37% somewhat or strongly opposing the organization.

Regarding the Alt Right, there are some very interesting numbers:

  • 6% of respondents said they strongly or somewhat supported the alt-right.
  • 8% expressed support for white nationalism.
  • 4% expressed support for neo-Nazism.
  • For both the alt-right and white nationalism questions, the poll found that about one-fifth of respondents said they neither supported nor opposed those groups or movements, perhaps revealing some potential additional support.

This last point really gets under Sabato’s craw. With respect to direct questions about the Alt Right (and, I suspect, even more general questions where certain answers might be construed as ‘pro white’), there appears to be a major Bradley Effect dynamic going on with white respondents:

A fundamental question that this poll sought to help clarify is whether there is a sizable portion of the American public that could be receptive to the types of messages being disseminated by groups associated with the alt-right and/or white supremacy. When respondents were asked if they supported the alt-right, white nationalists, and neo-Nazis, only a small percentage said they did. But for both the alt-right and white nationalism, about one-fifth of respondents said they neither supported nor opposed those groups or movements.

Within this poll a sizable number of respondents selected the “neither agree nor disagree” option. Given the racially-charged and controversial nature of some of the statements polled, these “middling” answers seemed remarkable, particularly given the fact that a “Don’t know” option was also presented and was available if, for example, one wished to express uncertainty or a lack of knowledge.

These are heartening numbers. While the MSM tries to portray the Alt Right as a very marginal, insignificant group (while simultaneously presenting the ‘neo-Nazi’ threat as heightened and worrisome), as a country we may have finally turned the corner towards a healthy, white identitarian consciousness in America.

Posted in Alt-Right, National, White Identity | Comments Off on Reuters/Ipsos Poll: White Consciousness is Coalescing in the U.S.

Interesting Flickers in Jonah Goldberg Interview

This interview of Jonah Goldberg by Ben Domenech is instructive. Of the #NeverTrumpers among Conservative, Inc., the two discuss (at the 10:00 marker) how GOPE has for the most part begun to adjust to Trump’s agenda, except for the “the foreign policy community” who, Goldberg notes, are more stridently NeverTrump than ever before. As examples, Goldberg cites Max Boot, Elliott Abrams, Jennifer Rubin, and (later) David Frum. It’s rather funny how the word *** or Israel never pops up once.

Another instructive segment takes place at 23:00 to 25:07, where Goldberg makes a passing reference to the rhetorical question “why are Jews so liberal?” As an example, he cites a (presumably non-Jewish) conservative scholar who wrote a book proposing the end of NATO, and how this scholar was absolutely pummeled by the aforementioned “foreign policy community”. Goldberg speculates such wrath is reserved for that sort of conservative figure rather than Irving Kristol. It’s an interesting dancing-around-the-subject.

At the 37:00 marker, the two discuss ‘fascism’ and the usual liberal tropes about Trump. Goldberg, who is no fan of Trump, waxes at how America is founded on government’s justification being limited to minimal unity and “to protect spheres of individualism”. He rejects calls for a greater collective cause as the ‘cult of unity’. “That is Sparta!” he intones. At the 42:00 marker, Goldberg notes his discomfort with Trump’s ‘blood of patriots’ rhetoric, then makes passing reference to what he sees as the troubling Alt Right ‘blood and soil’ critique of immigrants.

Goldberg rejects identity politics for white people, as part of his (alleged) rejection of identity politics in general. “Identity politics IP taken to its logical conclusion, he warns “could spell the end of this country.”

To his credit, Domenech displays a much better grasp of the trajectory our country is on, arguing that the proliferation of identity politics is where we are inexorably heading, a rational reaction to the Prime Mover that is the wildly growing Identity Politics of the Left.

Posted in Jewish, Politics | Comments Off on Interesting Flickers in Jonah Goldberg Interview

Kehinde Wiley’s Favored Symbols

Kehinde Wiley, the flamboyantly gay, Afrocentric ‘artist’ who delivered the hilariously awful Obama portrait, inserts sperm imagery into his paintings. See the right side of Obama’s temple, in what looks like a vein.

From a Quartz piece on another Wiley painting:

“In this reinterpretation of David’s Napoleon, Wiley embeds tiny swimming sperm in the red background, as a reference to African male virility, or potentially, promiscuity.”

Blacks celebrate promiscuity, leaving society-at-large to clean up the consequent messes, vis-a-vis endless welfare to fatherless black children and single black mothers.

Posted in Art, Black, National | Comments Off on Kehinde Wiley’s Favored Symbols

Uriah Heep – Can’t Stop Singing (1976)

Posted in Music | Comments Off on Uriah Heep – Can’t Stop Singing (1976)

Hood on the Portraits

Gregory Hood weighs in on the Mr. & Mrs. Obama “Affirmative-Action Portraits”:

Third-rate portraits portend a Third-World nation.

When the collapse begins, people generally don’t realize it. Rarely do statesmen acknowledge the Golden Age of their nation has passed; every leader tells his people their best days lie ahead. And the rituals of statecraft, above all, are designed to impose a sense of continuity and eternity. The nation is forever, the state is uncontested, and the polity is essentially the same as it was when it was founded. Even a revolutionary regime tries to co-opt the legitimacy of its predecessors, not confess to the masses that it is composed of mediocrities and frauds. Decline is usually subtle.

Except when it’s not. Like when the official paintings of Barack and Michelle Obama were unveiled at the National Portrait Gallery on Monday…

When an entire nation has to pretend representations of its former first couple are great works of art rather than two glorified participation trophies, the nation loses its self-respect…

There comes a point when an honor from a mainstream cultural institution becomes self-discrediting. We have an affirmative-action culture, in which “access” to institutions is prized over accomplishment, talent, or even meaning. America has become an affirmative-action nation.

Posted in Culture, Death of the West | Comments Off on Hood on the Portraits

Israel: The Double Standard – Pt. 3,182

From Haaretz, a truly remarkable story wherein a major national political figure… is honest. (“Justice Minister: Israel Must Keep Jewish Majority Even at the Expense of Human Rights”):

Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked said Monday that if not for the fence erected some years ago on the Egyptian border, “We would be seeing here a kind of creeping conquest from Africa.” The fence effectively stopped asylum-seekers from Sudan and Eritrea from entering the country.

In a speech to the Congress on Judaism and Democracy, Shaked also said, “I think that ‘Judaizing the Galilee’ is not an offensive term. We used to talk like that. In recent years we’ve stopped talking like that. I think it’s legitimate without violating the full rights of the Arab residents of Israel.”

The justice minister made the remarks in a wide-ranging speech on the controversy over the Jewish nation-state bill.

She further said, “There is place to maintain a Jewish majority even at the price of violation of rights.”…

… Shaked told the conference that “the state should say that there is place to maintain the Jewish majority even if it violates rights.”

Posted in Jewish, Middle East | Comments Off on Israel: The Double Standard – Pt. 3,182