Paris: “Gang of Youths” Strike Again

It was a “gang of youths” who savagely beat the Parisian policewoman on New Year’s Eve & who are responsible for another 1,000+ cars being torched across France on the same night.

Posted in Europe, Immigration | Comments Off on Paris: “Gang of Youths” Strike Again

Germany: Draco Would Be Proud

Germany’s new censorship law – keep in mind that Germany already has major bureaucratic limits to free speech — went into effect today. On Day 1 of the new law:

A prominent figure in the Alternative for Germany party (AfD) has run afoul of Germany’s draconian new censorship law, as officials crack down on whatever they deem to be “hate speech.”

Twitter froze the account of Beatrix von Storch, saying she had violated “hate speech” rules, after the politician tweeted her indignation at a New Year’s greeting issued in Arabic by the Cologne Police.

“What the hell is happening in this country? Why is an official police site tweeting in Arabic? Do you think it is to appease the barbaric, gang-raping hordes of Muslim men?” wrote von Storch, the deputy leader of the AfD party…

On New Year’s Day, Ms. von Storch’s account was shut down for 12 hours after Cologne police filed a criminal complaint against her for hate speech.

Once her account was unfrozen, the parliamentarian announced that her Facebook account had also been censored.

“This is the end of the rule of law,” she wrote, posting the message she received from Facebook administrators.

The new law is designed to curtail nationalism and the Right.

It is also serving as a trial balloon for FaceBorg, YouTube, and Twitter (who will eventually claim ‘success’ at reducing ‘hate’) to do the same in the U.S.

Posted in Europe, International, Political Correctness | Comments Off on Germany: Draco Would Be Proud

CFP: Interdisciplinary Resistance to Nationalist Borders

A CFP for radical pomo resistance! #NeverTrump! #MeToo! #OtherRandomHashtags!

deadline for submissions:
March 1, 2018
full name / name of organization:
Contention: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Protest
contact email:

Contention Special Edition Proposal

Editors: Jeffrey Butcher and Michael Noschka

Title of Special Edition:

Continental Divides: Interdisciplinary Resistance to Nationalist Borders

CFP:

The rise of the alt-right—the potential for fascism to claim the mantle of “populism”—is changing, or repeating, the political landscape of the West. From Trumpism in America to French and German elections to the Catalonia secession, the alt-right is flexing its muscles in important national debates, and extending its nationalism beyond respective national borders. From a philosophical perspective, this upsurge of alt-right nationalism brings with it an array of mind-body problems. There are problems of the body: black bodies, ethnic bodies, religious bodies, female bodies, transgender bodies. Likewise, there are problems of the mind: the nationalist logic of exclusion of “non-native” or non-normative bodies from its ontologically “pure” dominion. As these domains intersect within national borders this mind-body problem exposes itself as a problem of the body politic. This crisis repeats itself daily across the world (or at least the Western) stage. This ‘return of history’ heralds the call for this special issue.

What some have called a repeat of the rise of fascism during the early-twentieth-century threatens to bring “inter-nationalist” imperialist warfare and economic terror across the West and to those nations already subject to global Capitalism. While the rise of the alt-right shocks and horrifies left-wing parties, anti-fascist organizations, and even moderate populations, the editors of this special issue turn to philosophy broadly and Continental philosophy specifically to explore the potential of resistance to the rise of nationalism across the West. Our aim is thus to explain the phenomenon of nationalism, its attentive border construction (and how and why we allow this to occur), and to determine what social action is necessary to combat the new dominance of the alt-right before contemporary global fascism finishes its shape.

This call for papers welcomes any generative mode of intervention to the rise of the alt-right. These papers may come from multiple disciplines (i.e., the humanities, social sciences, hard sciences, and non-academic spheres); but because Contention addresses an interdisciplinary audience, contributions should be written in language that is accessible to a general academic audience. It is our hope that the interdisciplinary nature of Contention, and this special issue more specifically, will offer a variety of perspectives to approach this topic. To this end, we ask writers to consider interdisciplinary approaches to, but not to be limited by, the following topics of discussion and debate:

  • alt-right nationalism and mind-body problems
  • the biopower of protest / protest as biopower
  • political theology as resistance to alt-right religious radicalism
  • war as protest / protesting war
  • populism and/as protest
  • protesting populism
  • resistive politics and/or activism/protest as “middle spaces” in the sphere of global politics
  • what might “becoming a protester” and/or “becoming an activist” look like?
  • how internal conflicts of left-wing groups might create (or have created) favorable conditions for the rise of fascism
  • how nationalism might utilize the properties of (inter)national Capitalism to create an alt-right internationalism
  • how economic repression and power structures might determine the desire of self-repression
  • local, national, and international protest efforts and their successes and failures
  • the impact of Antifa and whether or not it is revolutionary or reactionary
  • forces of protest and the pathologies of failure—or why movements fail
  • support of the nation-state vs. nationalism—is there a difference?
  • are sovereignty and democracy nationalist fantasies?
  • (self)representation and/of/in the alt-right
  • national and international consequences of alt-right control
  • whether the new rise of the alt-right is a repetition of historical fascism and how it may be interrupted

While these categories invite myriad responses, all of which will be considered for publication in Contention, the editors of this special issue particularly invite submissions which draw upon or engage with a specific cohort of Continental philosophers whose works transcend and tear down the walls erected to enforce national and inter-national borders: Giorgio Agamben, for his archeology of Western biopolitics; Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, for their exposure of the West’s schizophrenic thinking (particularly as nationalism and Capitalism cohere); Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, for their analyses of the intersections among local and global economic forces as they pertain to the limits and potentialities of political bodies. Each of these philosophers propose modes of political thinking; such thinking is most timely now.

Deadline for Submission: March 1st, 2018

The submission process should use Contention’s submission system follow all of Contention’sguidelines currently detailed on the journal’s website:

http://contentionjournal.org/submit/

http://journals.berghahnbooks.com/_uploads/cont/contention_style_guide.pdf

When submitting, please specify in the cover page that the submission is for this special issue.

Posted in Academia, CFP, Postmodernism | Comments Off on CFP: Interdisciplinary Resistance to Nationalist Borders

Historical Revisionism in ‘The Post’

Peggy Noonoan on the totally predictable historical revisionism in the new Spielberg movie The Post:

President Nixon is portrayed as the villain of the story. And that is the opposite of the truth.

Nixon did not start the Vietnam War, he ended it. His administration was not even mentioned in the Pentagon Papers, which were finished before he took office.

When that dark, sad man tried to halt publication of the document, he was protecting not his own reputation but in effect those of others. Those others were his political adversaries—Lyndon Johnson and Ben Bradlee’s friend JFK—who the papers revealed had misled the public. If Nixon had been merely self-interested, he would have faked umbrage and done nothing to stop their publication. Even cleverer, he could have decried the leaking of government secrets while declaring and bowing to the public’s right to know.

Instead, he did what he thought was the right thing—went to court to prevent the publication of secrets that might harm America’s diplomatic standing while it attempted to extricate itself from a war…

Why does all this matter? Because we are losing history. It is not the fault of Hollywood, as they used to call it, but Hollywood is a contributor to it.

When people care enough about history to study and read it, it’s a small sin to lie and mislead in dramas. But when people get their history through entertainment, when they absorb the story of their times only through screens, then the tendency to fabricate is more damaging.

Posted in Film, Hollywood | Comments Off on Historical Revisionism in ‘The Post’

Fellow White People

This “Fellow White People” meme has been getting major traffic.

Posted in Jewish | Comments Off on Fellow White People

Whodunnit?!

I spit water onto my PC screen after reading this passage from a recent Steve Sailer post:

“Law & Order” is of course world-famous for being completely un-figure-out-able. Who will the real killer turn out to be: the Puerto Rican transgender sex worker, the black felon with all the Crips tattoos who converted to Nation of Islam on Death Row, or coal industry lawyer Choate Saltonstall Crowninshield VII of Park Avenue?

Posted in Hollywood, Humor | Comments Off on Whodunnit?!

Politico: “The Rise of Antifa”

From Politico’s photo essay on “The Rise of Antifa

As newly emboldened white nationalists rallied in American cities and college towns in 2017, an underground leftist movement emerged to confront them, using some of the same aggressive and sometimes violent tactics…

While most opponents of white nationalists are part of progressive movements that contrast their peacefulness and inclusiveness with the racism of neo-Nazis and other extremists, the anti-fascist militia known as Antifa adopts some of the same styles and attitudes of extreme far-right movements.

Yes, who can forget the times Milo and Ann Coulter smashed windows at Berkeley.

And the time Jason Kessler punched an elderly man at the Charlottesville gathering, simply for wearing a Bernie hat.

Posted in Left, MSM | Comments Off on Politico: “The Rise of Antifa”

Bono & The Primates

From a new Rolling Stone interview with the talented, but sometimes insufferable Bono, the singer waxes on rightwing nationalisms percolating in Europe and the election of Der Trumpenfuhrer:

People’s innocence had died. And a generation that had grown up thinking that the human spirit had a natural evolution toward fairness and justice was learning this might not be the case. My attitude was, “OK, good. Now it is time we wake up and realize we can’t take any of this for granted.” Big primates have been around a lot longer than democracy, and this dude who shall not be named – he is just a new manifestation of that big primate. We got shook. Even in Europe, people have forgotten what fascism did to them. Whether it was fascism described as Stalin or Mao in the state communism, whatever you want to call it. It is forgotten.

We are actually going back to the way we used to be. The new normal is the old normal. That is terrifying. The demonizing of “the other” has returned.

Posted in Left, Music | Comments Off on Bono & The Primates

NYT: “Confessions of a Digital Nazi Hunter”

With its connotation of those heady days in which “Nazi hunters” like Simon Wiesenthal helped capture Adolf Eichmann, the very title of “Confessions of a Digital Nazi Hunter” by Yair Rosenberg (a writer at Tablet Magazine, a Jewish identitarian publication) displays the unrivaled persecution complex of Jews and the concomitant megalomania and inflated sense of self that follows, wherein being offended is equated with being a ‘Nazi Hunter’:

Like many Jewish journalists who reported on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, I spent the 2016 election being harassed by a motley crew of internet racists who coalesced around the future president. They sent me threats, photoshopped me into gas chambers and hurled an uncreative array of anti-Semitic slurs my way. A study by the Anti-Defamation League found that I’d received the second-most abuse of any Jewish journalist on Twitter during the campaign cycle. My parents didn’t raise me to be No. 2; fortunately, there’s always 2020.

As a result, I’ve become something of an unintentional expert on alt-right trolls and their tactics. For the most part, these characters are largely laughable — sad, angry men hiding behind images of cartoon frogs, deathly afraid that their employers will uncover their online antics. But there are also more insidious individuals, whose digital skulduggery can be more consequential than the occasional bigoted bromide.

Alrighty then.

Rosenberg then gloats about his attempts to thwart so-called ‘impersonator trolls’:

You probably haven’t heard of these trolls, but that is precisely why they are so pernicious. These bigots are not content to harass Jews and other minorities on Twitter; they seek to assume their identities and then defame them.

The con goes like this: The impersonator lifts an online photo of a Jew, Muslim, African-American or other minority — typically one with clear identifying markers, like a yarmulke-clad Hasid or a woman in hijab. Using that picture as a Twitter avatar, the bigot then adds ethnic and progressive descriptors to the bio: “Jewish,” “Zionist,” “Muslim,” “enemy of the alt-right.”

False identity forged, the trolls then insert themselves into conversations with high-profile Twitter users — conversations that are often seen by tens of thousands of followers — and proceed to say horrifically racist things.

As an example of these ‘horrifically racist things’, Rosenberg provides the following photo with the caption: “An impersonator troll offers racist responses to stories tweeted by several major publications.”

Oh, the horrors.

Rosenberg bemoans:

This deception is relatively simple, but it is disturbingly effective. Most casual users aren’t likely to reverse image-search a troll’s avatar to see if it was stolen from someone else or peruse the account’s other tweets and realize that it only shares racist material. Twitter lacks the cultural competency to police such impersonators, even if it were interested in doing so.

So what we have here is basically Rosenberg raging at an innovative Alt-Right means of calling attention to (and hopefully ending) the ad hominem fallacy that the Left has hoisted upon any and all (positive) discussions of white identity. As one sees in countless Hollywood movies (e.g., American History X; The Believer; etc.), rational words of white identitarianism are typically delivered through the mouths of dastardly neo-Nazi villains. The merit of an argument ought to have nothing to do with who speaks the words. Thus, if Hitler said that “2 + 2 = 4”, it doesn’t mean you’re “with Hitler” if you too believe 2 + 2 = 4.

The relative effectiveness of ‘impersonator trolls’ is a testament to how susceptible many people have become (after decades of cultural conditioning) to the ad hominem fallacy as it pertains to expressions of white identitarianism; the noticing behavioral patterns of Jews or blacks; etc. This sociological fact is itself a reflection of the historical efficacy of Frankfurt School-styled political correctness.

Rosenberg then goes into full Jewish messianism mode:

So I set out to unmask them.

I asked my own Twitter followers whether it might be possible to create a bot that would reply to these impostors and expose their true nature to any users they tried to fool. Neal Chandra, a talented developer in San Francisco whom I’ve never met, replied, “I can try to throw something together this evening.” And so, after a week of testing, Impostor Buster was born.

Using a crowdsourced database of impersonator accounts, carefully curated by us to avoid any false positives, the bot patrolled Twitter and interjected whenever impostors tried to insinuate themselves into a discussion. Within days, our golem for the digital age had become a runaway success, garnering thousands of followers and numerous press write-ups. Most important, we received countless thank-yous from alerted would-be victims.

The plot thickens, however, when Rosenberg’s effort runs into some problems:

Then the problems began — but not from where you might expect. The Nazis realized they couldn’t beat the bot, so they started mass-reporting it to Twitter for “harassment.” Just as they duplicitously cast themselves as minorities, they disingenuously recast our response to their ongoing abuse as harassment.

Twitter sided with the Nazis.

Twitter sided with the Nazis!

In April, the service suspended Impostor Buster without explanation and reinstated it only after being contacted by the ADL’s cyber-hate team.

Phew! Thank G-d the mighty ADL (the most professional and well-funded channelers of Jewish paranoia) swooped in with helicopters and dispensed their Special Forces-like ‘Cyber Hate Team’ to save the day.

Over the next few months, we fine-tuned the bot to reduce its tweets and avoid tripping any of Twitter’s alarms. As the trolls continued to report the bot to no avail, we thought the problem was resolved. But we were wrong.

This month, Twitter suspended the bot again, and this time refused to revive it. The company’s justifications were both entirely accurate and utterly absurd. “A large number of people have blocked you in response to high volumes of untargeted, unsolicited, or duplicative content or engagements from your account,” we were informed. This was true; Impostor Buster had been blocked by many neo-Nazis. “A large number of spam complaints have been filed against you.” Yes, by neo-Nazis. “You send large numbers of unsolicited replies or mentions.” Yes, to neo-Nazis.

Everyone’s a “Nazi” with these people.

The real threat, apparently, was not these trolls — who today continue to roam the platform unchallenged — but our effort to combat them.

More persecution complex from the Kings of Victimhood.

We used Twitter’s tools to police itself — until Twitter fired the sheriff.

More messianism and inflated sense of self.

Hopefully, the activist JYT affording valuable column space to Rosenberg will awaken (latently neo-Nazi?) Twitter and remedy this.

Posted in Jewish, NYT | Comments Off on NYT: “Confessions of a Digital Nazi Hunter”

Age Gaps & Defs of “Sexual Harassment”

A Reuters/Ipsos poll asked 3,000+ American adults about what should and should not be classified as ‘sexual harassment’. Among its findings:

Fifty-two percent of people from racial minorities said that they considered non-consensual hugging to be sexual harassment, compared with 39 percent of whites.

While most adults said they thought that it was sexual harassment to send “pornographic pictures” to someone without their consent, younger people appeared to be more permissive.

Eighty-three percent of millennials, or those adults born after 1982, said it was sexual harassment, compared with 90 percent of gen-Xers (born 1965-1981) and 94 percent of baby boomers (born 1946-1964.)

One good sign: overall, younger people appear to be inclined to be #MeToo alarmists.

Posted in Culture | Comments Off on Age Gaps & Defs of “Sexual Harassment”