NYT’s Harvey Story in ’04

Sharon Waxman describes how the NYT spiked ‘gutted’ a story about Harvey Weinstein’s sexual misconduct way back in 2004:

In 2004, I was still a fairly new reporter at The New York Times when I got the green light to look into oft-repeated allegations of sexual misconduct by Weinstein. It was believed that many occurred in Europe during festivals and other business trips there.

traveled to Rome and tracked down the man who held the plum position of running Miramax Italy. According to multiple accounts, he had no film experience and his real job was to take care of Weinstein’s women needs, among other things.

As head of Miramax Italy in 2003 and 2004, Fabrizio Lombardo was paid $400,000 for less than a year of employment. He was on the payroll of Miramax and thus the Walt Disney Company, which had bought the indie studio in 1993.

I had people on the record telling me Lombardo knew nothing about film, and others citing evenings he organized with Russian escorts.

At the time, he denied that he was on the payroll to help Weinstein with favors. From the story: “Reached in Italy, Mr. Lombardo declined to comment on the circumstances of his leaving Miramax or Ricucci, saying they were legal matters being handled by lawyers. ‘I am very proud of what we achieved at Miramax here in Italy,’ he said of his work for the film company. ‘It cannot be that they hired me because I’m a friend.’”

I also tracked down a woman in London who had been paid off after an unwanted sexual encounter with Weinstein. She was terrified to speak because of her non-disclosure agreement, but at least we had evidence of a pay-off.

The story I reported never ran.

After intense pressure from Weinstein, which included having Matt Damon and Russell Crowe call me directly to vouch for Lombardo and unknown discussions well above my head at the Times, the story was gutted.

It’s nice to know St. Matt Damon now has this information in the public realm.

Have you noticed how Weinstein seemed to target gentile shiksas? 

Posted in NYT | Comments Off on NYT’s Harvey Story in ’04

Sen. Geary 2018

“These hearings on the Mafia are in no way whatsoever a slur upon the great Italian people. Because I can state, from my own knowledge and experience, that Italian-Americans are among the most loyal, most law-abiding, patriotic, hard working American citizens in this land. And it would be a shame, Mr. Chairman, if we allowed a few rotten apples to bring a bad name to the whole barrel. Because from the time of the great Christopher Columbus up through the time of Enrico Fermi right up to the present day, Italian-Americans have been pioneers in building and defending our great nation. They are the soil of the earth and one of the backbones of this country.”

Posted in Humor | Comments Off on Sen. Geary 2018

The Case For “The Case For Colonialism”

A couple of weeks ago, I posted on Political Science Professor Bruce Gilley’s new paper “The Case for Colonialism”, which I was quite surprised ever got published.

Well, right on cue, the article has been yanked and sent to the Memory Hole Gulag.

From the Chronicle of Higher Education (which really ought to change its name):

A controversial essay that offered a defense of colonialism and led to a revolt at Third World Quarterly has been withdrawn due to “serious and credible threats of personal violence” to the journal’s editor, according to a notice posted by the journal’s publisher, Taylor & Francis.

The essay, “The Case for Colonialism,” was withdrawn at the request of the journal’s editor, Shahid Qadir, and in agreement with the essay’s author, Bruce Gilley, an associate professor of political science at Portland State University, the notice said.

It is most unfortunate that the article’s author appears to have cucked out.

The article itself met the usual criteria for inclusion in the journal:

The publisher said that it had conducted a thorough investigation after receiving complaints about the essay and found that it had undergone double-blind peer review, in line with the journal’s editorial policy.

But this has zero weight when the The Other’s feelings are involved. The Other is offended and, as a result, threatens violence, which is precisely what The Other typically resorts to. (Way to reinforce stereotypes guys!):

However, the publisher’s notice continued, the journal’s editor received “serious and credible threats of personal violence” linked to the publication of the essay. “As the publisher, we must take this seriously,” the withdrawal notice reads. “Taylor & Francis has a strong and supportive duty of care to all our academic editorial teams, and this is why we are withdrawing this essay.”

Backlash against Third World Quarterly was swift after it published the colonialism essay last month. Fifteen people on the journal’s 34-member board resigned, and a petition seeking a retraction drew more than 10,000 signatures.

In the wake of the controversy, the author, Mr. Gilley, had asked that his essay be withdrawn. “I regret the pain and anger that it has caused for many people,” Mr. Gilley wrote last month on his website.

If you go to the page the paper was originally posted to, the title of the paper remains, but where the abstract was, it now reads:

Abstract

WITHDRAWAL NOTICE

This Viewpoint essay has been withdrawn at the request of the academic journal editor, and in agreement with the author of the essay. Following a number of complaints, Taylor & Francis conducted a thorough investigation into the peer review process on this article. Whilst this clearly demonstrated the essay had undergone double-blind peer review, in line with the journal’s editorial policy, the journal editor has subsequently received serious and credible threats of personal violence. These threats are linked to the publication of this essay. As the publisher, we must take this seriously. Taylor & Francis has a strong and supportive duty of care to all our academic editorial teams, and this is why we are withdrawing this essay.

Again, the above paragraph replaces the abstract of a double-blind, peer reviewed, academic article.

How symbolic.

Let that sink in.

Thankfully, I downloaded “The Case for Colonialism” before it was scrubbed.

Posted in Academia, International, Political Correctness | Comments Off on The Case For “The Case For Colonialism”

Grace and Frankie

While my Netflix was on pause today, it went into screensaver/Netflix promo mode, and up popped this image promoting the 4th season (who knew?) of a Netflix original ‘comedy’ called Grace and Frankie, created by Marta Kauffman and Howard J. Morris.  

From the image alone, we can pretty much guess the show’s premise, write the scripts, and envision the ‘jokes’ ourselves.

Christ, watching these far left geriatric hacks belatedly try to hitch their fading wagons onto the aughts-trendy subgenre of gays-in-sitcoms, while simultaneously trying to communicate how ‘with it’ they are, has got be a special level of Dante’s Hell. From Wikipedia:

The series follows Grace, a retired cosmetics mogul, and Frankie, a hippie art teacher, whose husbands, Robert and Sol, are successful divorce lawyers in San Diego. Grace and Frankie’s lives are turned upside down when Robert and Sol announce that they are in love with each other and are leaving their wives. Now, the women, who have never particularly liked each other, are forced to live together and learn to unite and cope with difficulties.

Furthermore, the Lily Tomlin (Frances “Frankie” Bergstein) and Sam Waterson (Sol Bergstein) characters are Jewish while the Jane Fonda (Grace Hanson) and Martin Sheen (Robert Hanson) characters share a most gentile surname.

How much do you want to bet that, of the 4 characters, Jane Fonda is the most uptight and WASPy? Or that Lily Tomlin, who plays a hippie art teacher, is the quicker to both accept and celebrate her husband’s homosexuality?

Cue the predictable jokes about stuffy cis white people. Hijinx ensues!

Posted in Hollywood | Comments Off on Grace and Frankie

Spot the Difference

In response to Pat Buchanan’s recent column on the Las Vegas shooter, a commenter notes the press conference the sheriff of Spokane County, Washington gave after a high school shooting. When pressed on gun control by a member of the lugenpresse, the sheriff responded:

“It all depends on the 15-year-old. I can tell you, folks, I carried a gun all my life. I hunted, I shot. My friends and I… It’s huntin’ season back home. When I was in high school, every one of those rigs in the high school parking lot had a gun in the gun rack. Why? We went huntin’ on the way home. None of those guns ever walked into a school. None of those guns ever shot anybody. What’s the difference? Did the gun change? Or did you, as a society, change?

Posted in Culture | Comments Off on Spot the Difference

The Steins & The Bergs

From the NYT piece “Harvey Weinstein Paid Off Sexual Harassment Accusers for Decades”:

At Fox News, where the conservative icons Roger E. Ailes and Bill O’Reilly were accused of harassment, women have received payouts well into the millions of dollars. But most of the women involved in the Weinstein agreements collected between roughly $80,000 and $150,000, according to people familiar with the negotiations.

Goyim-run media enterprises like FNC aren’t as astute in preserving the shekels.

And I’m not sure what to make of this:

Mr. Weinstein was a volcanic personality, though, given to fits of rage and personal lashings of male and female employees alike. When a female guest of his had to wait for a hotel room upgrade, he yelled that Ms. O’Connor would be better off marrying a “fat, rich Jewish” man because she was probably just good for “being a wife” and “making babies,” she wrote in her memo. (He added some expletives, she said.)

What the whole episode does convey, however, is yet another example of what a cesspool Jewish dominated Hollywood is.

Posted in Hollywood | Comments Off on The Steins & The Bergs

Buzzfeed: “Alt-White: How The Breitbart Machine Laundered Racist Hate”

The longform Buzzfeed piece “Alt-White: How The Breitbart Machine Laundered Racist Hate” has lots of insider baseball stuff (via leaked emails) involving Milo Yiannopoulos and his inner circle.

Much of it involves the sausage-making aspects of BNN meme creation circa 2015-16, along with the associated obsessions with branding, vulnerable egos, and other miscellaneous vanities.

There is the small revelation that Milo did (and perhaps still does) have some peripheral contacts with race-conscious Alt-Right types.

Posted in Alt-Right, MSM | Comments Off on Buzzfeed: “Alt-White: How The Breitbart Machine Laundered Racist Hate”

Derb: “If Catalonia, Why Not California, Texas, Or New England?”

Derb asks “If Catalonia, Why Not California, Texas, Or New England?”:

The great British national conservative Enoch Powell, who fifty years ago gave those eloquent warnings about the evils of mass immigration, once said that if Britain were at war he would fight for Britain, even if it was a communist dictatorship.

The Greek poet in Byron’s Don Juan, living under the Ottoman Turks, likewise looked back to the Greek tyrants of antiquity and sighed:

Our masters then
Were still, at least, our countrymen.

… Here’s where I renew my call for a worldwide alliance of nationalists along the lines of the old Comintern, the Communist International.

We can call this alliance the Natintern, the Nationalist International. I’m still waiting for someone to come up with a suitable anthem, to be called of course The Nationale.

Posted in Secession, White Identity | Comments Off on Derb: “If Catalonia, Why Not California, Texas, Or New England?”

New Yorker: “Why Are So Many Fascist Monuments Still Standing in Italy?”

The SJW jihad against symbols of implicit whiteness marches onward. In The New Yorker, Ruth Ben-Ghiat asks “Why Are So Many Fascist Monuments Still Standing in Italy?”:

Italy, the first Fascist state, has had a long relationship with right-wing politics; with the election of Silvio Berlusconi, in 1994, the country also became the first to bring a neo-Fascist party to power, as part of Berlusconi’s center-right coalition.* But this alone is not enough to explain Italians’ comfort with living amid Fascist symbols. Italy was, after all, home to Western Europe’s biggest anti-Fascist resistance and its most robust postwar Communist Party. Until 2008, center-left coalitions maintained that legacy, often getting more than forty per cent of the vote in elections. So why is it that, as the United States has engaged in a contentious process of dismantling monuments to its Confederate past, and France has rid itself of all streets named after the Nazi collaborationist leader Marshall Pétain, Italy has allowed its Fascist monuments to survive unquestioned?

The writer adds this gem:

I was living in Rome on a Fulbright fellowship in 1994, and was jolted awake more than once by shouts of “Heil Hitler!” and “Viva il Duce!” coming from a nearby pub.

Paranoid much?

Ben-Ghiat, a graduate of Brandeis University and a current Professor of History at NYU, has all the requisite background checkmarks for entry into The Club. From her personal webpage:

Ben-Ghiat grew up in Pacific Palisades, California, where many famous exiles from Nazism relocated. Hearing about their struggles shaped her interest in investigating what happens to societies when authoritarian governments take hold. How do strongmen stay in power, and why do so many people stay loyal to them no matter what they say or do? What are the fates of those who resist? Fascist Modernities (2004, trans. La cultura fascista, 2004) answers these questions, as does her award-winning study of Fascist war propaganda, Italian Fascism’s Empire Cinema (2015).

You get the idea.

Back to The New Yorker piece, where Ben-Ghiat then intones:

The right wing in Germany, lacking the benefit of emotionally charged public monuments, has been orchestrating its gatherings around fringe events such as “right rock” music concerts. Yet, at AfD events, such as a march earlier in September, in Jena, Nazi chants have begun to resound. Unless the Party takes a hard line against Fascist symbols, it’s only a matter of time, one imagines, before they reappear. In Italy, where they never went away, the risk is different: if monuments are treated merely as depoliticized aesthetic objects, then the far right can harness the ugly ideology while everyone else becomes inured.

So, you see, it is imperative that either destroy, put a burka over, or put into deep storage out of public view, any and all symbols of ‘fascism’, the Confederacy, former slave owners, and (hopefully) all white historical figures.

Posted in Left | Comments Off on New Yorker: “Why Are So Many Fascist Monuments Still Standing in Italy?”

NYT: “An Exodus From Puerto Rico Could Remake Florida Politics”

Many NYT stories are 50% news story and 50% activist strategy session, with a topping of wish-fulfillment, and “An Exodus From Puerto Rico Could Remake Florida Politics” by Michael Tackett, which is about the exodus, post Hurricane Maria, of Puerto Ricans to Florida, is one such story:

There are more than a million Puerto Ricans in Florida, a number that has doubled since 2001, driven largely until now by a faltering economy. But their political powers have evolved slowly in this state, and the wave of potential voters from the island could quickly change that calculus.

If the estimates hold, and several officials said they might be low, the Puerto Rican vote, which has been strongly Democratic, could have rough parity with the Cuban vote in the state, for years a bulwark for Republicans in both state and national races.

“What’s clear is that this is going to be a more powerful swing group,” said Anthony Suarez, a lawyer here, who has run for office as both a Republican and a Democrat. “Just like everybody has to go to Miami and stop in Versailles to have coffee to court the Cuban community, that is going to start happening here.”…

Emily Bonilla, a Democratic county commissioner who was elected from a district that is 80 percent white, is working to provide services for the new arrivals, mindful that they may soon be her constituents. “Puerto Ricans are unique,” she said. “We support each other regardless of party, but no surprise, the majority become Democrats.”

Notice the presumption of identity bloc politics based on ethnicity being (for non-whites only, of course) natural and acceptable.

I cracked up at the 2nd paragraph of this passage:

Several of the activists were intrigued by Mr. Trump’s suggestion that he would try to wipe out Puerto Rico’s bloated public debt, but then others noted that other administration officials had quickly dismissed that idea. And they were unanimous in their criticism of Mr. Trump for waiting two weeks before visiting Puerto Rico and about his harsh remarks about the mayor of San Juan, whom he accused of “poor leadership.”

“That was horrible,” said Zoraida Rios-Andino. “He treated us like a third-world country.”

The NYT piece then goes into full political strategy session mode:

Ultimately, the impact Puerto Ricans have on politics will be up to people like Esteban Garces, state director of Mi Familia Vota, who has been working in the state since 2012 and said his group had registered more than 65,000 voters since then.

Puerto Ricans are American citizens by birth, so registering them is far easier than registering Latino immigrants. His organization has been building a network that will make it easier to register those who come from the island and declare Florida residency. “We have the capacity and the know-how to step up the scale,” Mr. Garces said.

“This is a defining moment,” he said. “Historically Cubans have always been thought of as the political powerhouse in Florida, but over the years their concentration has been decreasing. Now, there are almost more Puerto Ricans than Cubans, which will create a dynamic shift in how the Latino vote in Florida goes.”

It is too soon, he said, to push to register people as they arrive, many stricken by loss. But with a governor’s race next year, Mr. Garces is preparing to mobilize after the migrants have had time to settle in.

And the sooner white enclaves are eradicated and/or subsumed by nonwhite enclaves, the better it will be for all.

Posted in Hispanics, National | Comments Off on NYT: “An Exodus From Puerto Rico Could Remake Florida Politics”