A Tale of Two Nazi Salutes

So, when a conservative does a Nazi salute in a mocking tone, there is hell to pay:

CNN is reporting that it has severed ties with commentator Jeffery Lord on Thursday after he tweeted “Sieg Heil!” at a liberal activist on Twitter.

Lord, a columnist for conservative magazine The American Spectator, tweeted the Nazi victory salute at Angelo Carusone, president of the liberal group Media Matters for America.

“Nazi salutes are indefensible,” a CNN spokesperson said, according to the network. “Jeffrey Lord is no longer with the network.”

The controversial tweet by Lord gained attention after several publications reported it and Carusone took a screenshot and tweeted it at CNN, asking for the network to comment on “on air talent issuing (in serious and non-ironic way) Nazi victory salutes.”

In the opinion piece that eventually led to his ouster from CNN, Lord took issue with a Media Matters campaign to get Fox’s Sean Hannity fired from his network.

Media Matters urged its supporter to pressure advdertisers on Hannity’s program to withdraw their support. Lord argued in his piece that this was a “fascist game” and an effort to end Hannity’s “free speech.”

But when a liberal does a Nazi salute in a mocking tone, there is crickets:

Socially acceptable Nazi salute

On Thursday night’s edition of The Late Show, comedian Stephen Colbert decided it would be a good idea to throw multiple Nazi salutes.

Colbert was making a joke about President Donald Trump’s response to the riots in Charlottesville when he threw Nazi salutes in a couple of different directions.

“[Trump] is definitely taking it to a higher level, I’d say his support is about up there,” Colbert said as he made the salute. “Right about here.”

It’s the same with Antifa violence being okay because they are seeking ‘peace through violence’.

Now that you know the rules, play ball!

Posted in Culture Wars, Left, MSM | Comments Off on A Tale of Two Nazi Salutes

The Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean (1972)

Loosely based on the real life figure of Judge Roy Bean, The Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean is written by the iconoclastic John Milius and directed by Hollywood veteran John Huston, the latter seemingly trying in this film to prove his relevance in a post-Peckinpah cinematic world of revisionist Westerns. The film has several parallels, in fact, with Peckinpah’s The Wild Bunch (1969) and The Ballad of Cable Hogue (1970).

Newman plays a criminal who, being saved from death by a Mexican peasant girl, decides to establish a town squarely in the place of his near-death, with himself as its sole arbiter of a self-interested and conveniently-dispensed ‘law’. He appoints a gang likely to rob him as his marshals; he ‘sentences’ a group of prostitutes to keep his marshals company; he has his marshals rob robbers and cites as a ‘fine’ exactly the amount of money the latter has stolen; etc.

“Law is the handmaiden of justice,” he often says in the film, and on one occasion, when he reverses the phrase by mistake, is called on it, but says both apply.

Of the figure of Bean, Milius has said:

Roy Bean is an obsessed man. He’s like Lawrence of Arabia. He sits out there in the desert and he’s got this great vision of law and order and civilization and he kills people and does anything in the name of progress. I love those kind of people! That’s the kind of people who built this country! That’s the American spirit!

Paul Newman’s performance shines above all else here, but there are a few standout supporting performances. Anthony Perkins is superb in his small role as an eccentric drifting preacher, and John Huston himself has a cameo as Grizzly Adams, who gifts Bean with a trained, beer-drinking grizzly bear, which for many years becomes something of a mascot and attraction to Bean’s saloon. (The bear’s ultimate fate has me convinced that The Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean, like The Wild Bunch, was one of the cinematic Western films serving as an inspiration for Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian.) A young Ned Beatty provides a wonderful turn as one of Bean’s marshals and lifelong acolytes; Stacy Keach has a memorable scene as the psychopathic albino outlaw ‘Bad Bob’; and Roddy McDowall plays to type as the legalistic Frank Gass.

The film has its flaws, and tries a bit too hard to exhibit the sort of cold, anti-hero world that was ascendant in Hollywood at the time it was made. Bean is a selfish, short-sighted, and mean S.O.B., inhabiting an amoral world of incredibly cruelty. The Blood Meridian comparison is apt in that Bean has no real moral center, and neither does the world around him, a world in which ‘law’ is practically isomorphic with power.

Unlike a similar motivation in The Wild Bunch, there’s not a sufficient build-up of secondary characters’ personas for a successful emotional catharsis when, towards the end of the film, Bean’s marshals undertake what amounts to a suicide mission on behalf of Bean’s honor. That being said, The Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean, while being a strange and uneven tragicomic film, does have its moments and does, in the end, convey how life is comprised of a series of contingencies, which we habitually try to impart meaning to after the fact.

Posted in Film | Comments Off on The Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean (1972)

Schools Are Running Out of White Children

The NYT has a piece on the shifting demographics in American public schools. With the country as a whole become more Hispanic and less White, it comes as no surprise that American public schools are reflecting those same demographic shifts:

The racial makeup of the U.S. school system is shifting. Public schools are seeing surges in the enrollment of students of color; Latinos are leading the increases, while the numbers of white students are shrinking. White families in cities like Washington are flocking to private schools, where fewer black students are in attendance.

With this shift comes the expected lowering score averages, lower graduation rates, etc., without whites to prop up the numbers.

I almost spit my coffee onto my monitor when I read Steve Sailer’s retort to the piece:

The big problem is obviously that America is running out white children to use to integrate public schools.

Perhaps progressives will soon demand a court-ordered white child breeding program to increase the number of white children to be drafted into the Integration Corps.

Then, as quickly as first laughed, I began to wonder if some less extreme variation of this theme (e.g., the forced busing of white kids,  wherever they may be and whose parents can’t afford private school, to black/brown school districts) might not be on the horizon.

Posted in Immigration, National | Comments Off on Schools Are Running Out of White Children

FNC: Bolling Out

Eric Bolling has been ousted from FNC and that trainwreck of a show “The Specialists” has been cancelled.

What needs to happen next: Move ‘The Five’ back to 5pm, and open up the 9pm slot for a strong, non-RINO voice. Follow the successful, resonant perspective of the Tucker Carlson model.

The buzz seems to be that Laura Ingraham will be filling the slot.

Update: Bolling’s 19 year old son, his only child, has died one day after Bolling’s departure from FNC. I cannot imagine the horror of all this. My prayers are with Bolling and his family.

Posted in MSM | Comments Off on FNC: Bolling Out

Los Brincos – El Pasaporte (1967)

These guys were the Beatles of Spain in the late ‘60s. I can’t get this tune of theirs out of my head.

Posted in Music | Comments Off on Los Brincos – El Pasaporte (1967)

The Atlantic: Have Smartphones Destroyed a Generation?

This is the single best article/study I’ve read to date regarding the impact of smartphones (and social media) on Generation Z, looking at the radical impact this technology, and its concomitant new forms of socialization, are having on the psychological health of the young. Not all of this impact is negative, but the greater part of it is.

Here are some of the standout passages from this lengthy piece:

I’ve been researching generational differences for 25 years, starting when I was a 22-year-old doctoral student in psychology…

Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Technology | Comments Off on The Atlantic: Have Smartphones Destroyed a Generation?

AP: “Undocumented Citizens”

The AP changes the vernacular to “undocumented citizens”.

Posted in Cultural Marxism, Immigration, MSM | Comments Off on AP: “Undocumented Citizens”

The Poverty of Libertarianism – Pt. 3,182

The first 60 seconds of this Tucker interview with a Libertarian chick gets to the core of why I left the Libertarian Party many years ago.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlJu6Br3hvE

Posted in Immigration, Libertarianism | Comments Off on The Poverty of Libertarianism – Pt. 3,182

Fallows: DACA is Not CACA

From James Fallow’s piece on DACA in The Atlantic:

I’ve followed the politics and reality of immigration for a long time. In the mid-1980s, I traveled around the country for several months on a big reporting project for The Atlantic about that era’s new migrants. I went and learned about the Haitians and Cubans of South Florida, the Vietnamese of Arkansas and the Gulf Coast, the Central Americans of Houston, the Hmong of Fresno, the Mexicans of the greater Southwest, the Puerto Ricans and Dominicans of greater New York, the Lebanese of Detroit—and the native-born members of the communities they were changing.

What I found and argued then was that the process of short-term disruption and longer-term adaptation through which the U.S. opened itself to immigration still prevailed.

That is, immigration has always been disruptive, from the time of the Germans and Irish in the mid-1800s to the groups I was seeing a century-plus later, or their counterparts today. And periodically this disruption has led to political and legal responses that looked bad (and racially driven) in retrospect, from the Chinese Exclusion Act of the 1880s to the nativist restrictions that essentially shut down most immigration for almost a generation after World War I.

Before that war, the U.S. was open to a surge of immigrants from eastern and southern Europe. Greeks, Italians, and Poles; Russians and Serbs; Swedes and Danes; Jews, Turks, and Arabs; all these plus others arrived, in addition to the ongoing flow of English, Irish, and Germans. All of my wife’s forebears in America came as children from Bohemia in this turn-of-the-century wave; so did one of my grandmothers, from Germany. “Race-decline” theories gained enormous intellectual and political traction in response, through popular books like The Passing of the Great Race and articles in this very magazine during its nativist phase a century ago. The race-war arguments were an important part of the “national origins” immigration system that prevailed from the 1920s through the early 1960s, with a strong preference for immigrants from Western Europe and tight limits on those from anywhere else.

But—I argued 30 years ago in The Atlantic, and have come to believe more strongly over the years—the United States differed from most other societies in its greater absorptive ability, and the resulting imperfectly open society enjoyed powerful economic, cultural, creative, diplomatic, actuarial, and simple human benefits from becoming a nation-of-nations.

So that’s my starting point. E pluribus unum is a real thing, and it is the fundamental American advantage.

If this piece has done one useful thing, it has motivated me to re-familiarize myself with the figure of Madison Grant, whose The Passing of the Great Race was way ahead of its time, and is still relevant today, despite all of Cathedral Culture dismissing it as ‘racist pseudoscience’.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on Fallows: DACA is Not CACA

At Home With George Clooney In Italy

From a long THR profile of the quintessential liberal Hollywood elitist, George Clooney (“At Home With George Clooney in Italy: Amal, the Twins, Politics and an Incendiary New Movie”):

George Clooney strides across the lush lawn of his Lake Como home and points toward a cluster of trees, the only barrier that separates him and this 18th century Italian villa from an increasingly invasive world. “That’s where he got in,” he says, more matter-of-fact than angry. “The guy climbed the fence and got up into the trees there.”

The “he” in question is a paparazzo. Less than 24 hours earlier, news was tearing across the internet that a photographer — one of hordes that swarm around Clooney like the mosquitoes on the nearby lake — had slipped past the guardhouse, crept through the bushes, crawled up a tree and snapped pictures of the star and his wife, Amal, cradling their 7-week-old twins. Clooney vowed to sue. The fact that a stranger could penetrate his sanctum sanctorum — the one place where, for a few brief weeks each summer, he can flee the pressures of his almost unparalleled celebrity — infuriated him…

“Every single day there’s some crazy sort of infringement,” he says. “And you go, ‘OK, we’ll eat it. That’s what we have to do.’ But when someone breaks the law, that’s beyond what we bargained for, beyond the pact I made: that when you’re famous, you’re going to be followed. I don’t know anyone who wouldn’t be furious.”

But George is against Walls, remember.

George likes to assemble The Important People™ to his swank Lake Como pad, to plan out utopian strategies for saving the world:

Each summer, this prince of the New World exiles himself to the heart of the Old, an ancient terrain of artists and aristocrats. It’s here that Clooney invites friends, family and a few chosen acquaintances (Charlie Rose, David Gergen and Samantha Power, among others) to join him for a contemporary Algonquin Round Table, one of the few remnants of the past for which this maestro of the present still hankers. “I was always enamored of that idea,” he says. “All these really interesting, smart people, sitting around having conversations.”

Barack Obama might soon be one of them. Clooney is hoping Obama will visit his Lombardian estate, just as he did Clooney’s home in Sonning, England, where the former president spent a night in early June (along with a squadron of Secret Service), remaining for a five-hour meal, bantering and playing hoops.

Then we get to read all about Clooney’s new film, the latest in a long line of “suburban America are racist and sexist fascists” films (a fetish in Hollywood) and how ‘poignant’ the film is today in AmeriKKKa:

Racism is at the heart of Clooney’s new film, Suburbicon, a drama set in the late 1950s that he directed and co-wrote with Heslov, starring Matt Damon and Julianne Moore.

The movie, which debuted Sept. 2 at the Venice Film Festival, interweaves two stories: a family drama, as a seemingly ordinary husband and father (Damon) becomes increasingly off-kilter; and a racial conflict, as a white neighborhood turns against a black family that has just moved in, whose superficial “abnormality” masks the genuine abnormality of the white family. It’s Clooney’s most dyspeptic take yet on the state of his country.

“I wanted it to be violent, I wanted it to be angry, and I think it’s a very angry film,” he says, fixing me a coffee as we sit at a long, wooden table in his dark, country-style kitchen, three dogs loping around at our feet. “We’re at a time when we need to address these issues, and unfortunately they’re issues that we have never completely exorcised.”

The project originated with the Coen brothers, who wrote the first drafts of a screenplay they planned to film and then in the late 1990s approached Clooney to star. But their script depicted only the white family’s tale. When Clooney and Heslov contemplated the race issues that had simmered during Donald Trump’s run for the White House, they decided to include a second plot element, drawing inspiration from the real-life drama of Levittown, Pennsylvania, in 1957, when a housing project of cookie-cutter homes erupted in violence after the arrival of an African-American family named Myers.

“What I found fascinating, growing up in Kentucky, was that whenever you’d see these movies about any form of bigotry, they were always with a Southern accent,” says Clooney. “Those in the North love to think they had nothing to do with it. They love to wash their hands and say, ‘Actually, we were the liberals. We were against slavery and [for] civil rights.’ And the truth of the matter is much more complicated. There were a lot of problems, particularly in places like Levittown. They built a fence around the people’s homes; they hung confederate flags around it; they named their dog ‘Nigger.’ They got instruments and played all night, 24 hours a day, just to try to get these people to leave.”

Clooney showed news footage of Levittown to his cast, who were only vaguely aware of what had happened there. “I didn’t know about that before George told me,” says Damon, who slashed his usual fee and then shot Suburbicon after wrapping four others that he’d made back-to-back. “I was floored. It’s that incredible thing where people are like: ‘Well, we’re not racist; we just don’t want them to live here.’ “

Damon, mind you, lives at in a nice house in an area that, like Clooney’s Lake Como area, doesn’t likely have a lot of low-income black people.

But, hey, it’s all about Virtue Signaling.

We learn of the on-set devastation, on the night Der Trumpenfuhrer was elected POTUS:

There was a different kind of twist during the shoot, when Trump was elected president, shocking many of the cast and crew. “We were home by 4 p.m., waiting for the returns,” says Moore. “Everybody was pretty devastated. [Then] as we were working on the movie, we felt the tone shift. The realization of the film became much darker than we’d thought.”

And then there were the horrors of the Reichstag Fire Charlottesville incident:

But Clooney hasn’t laughed about politics since the election; his horror will only grow in the weeks after our Lake Como meeting, especially following Trump’s post-Charlottes­ville comments suggesting an equivalence between white supremacists and those who oppose them. “It would be best for the country if some of these Republicans — and some of them I’m very good friends with, actually — stood up [to him],” Clooney says in a late August phone call. “There’s an important distinction that doesn’t get said enough — the difference between Black Lives Matter and the KKK and the skinheads and the alt-right is this: Black Lives Matter was protesting in support of racial equality. Period. Sometimes it got out of hand, absolutely. But that’s what they were doing. You can never say, ‘Well, those guys were bad and these guys were bad.’ And to hear those words come out of the president of the United States, that is a great crime.”

The interviewer inserts herself as a character in the interview/profile, and the elitism dripping from her pen is excruciating. Here she is mentioning her exchange with Clooney’s wife Amal:

We touch on her time as a student at Oxford (“I loved it,” she says), then shift gears to that old chestnut: whether it’s easier to date in London or Los Angeles or New York. Samantha jumps in, and so do I, and soon everyone’s chattering…

In October 2013, Clooney invited Amal to visit him at London’s historic Abbey Road Studios, where he was supervising the recording of the score for his 2014 release Monuments Men. “That was a good first date,” he says. “Then we went for dinner. She said, ‘Let’s go to this place.’ It was one of those places that was incredibly hip and chic. And when we came out, there were 50 paparazzi there. But she handled it like a champ. And pretty quickly, things escalated once I was in London.”

Clooney remained there for six weeks. Afterward, “we spent Christmas together in Cabo San Lucas,” he continues. “Then we went on a safari in Kenya. Amal loves giraffes; they’re her favorite animal. She went to this place called Giraffe Manor, where the giraffes stick their heads through the windows and kiss you.”

Lord, give me cancer.

And what good philanthropic work will Clooney do with all his money, like the recent $300 million windfall he got from the sale of a tequila company he co-owned?

He and Amal will take some of that money and use it to support the causes they hold most dear. Days after our interview, the Clooneys will announce a $1 million grant to the Southern Poverty Law Center, and that’s just the start.

Well, that’s a relief, given how cash-starved the $PLC is.

Nowhere in the piece is it mentioned that Clooney’s Lake Como paradise has been experiencing some decidedly non-paradisical developments of late.  Will he enhance elements of his home security (aka, build his own metaphorical ‘Wall’) as a result? Will he find another ‘reason’ to leave Como? Time will tell.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRdwLPrEhOc

Posted in Hollywood, Left | Comments Off on At Home With George Clooney In Italy