Wisdom

“Part of what I’ve learned is that the white-nuclear family is one of the most powerful forces supporting white supremacy,” said the Professor.

Posted in Anti-White, White Identity | Comments Off on Wisdom

The New Yorker: “Pocahontas” Not a Racial Slur, Says Prominent White Expert

This is what passes for ‘humor’ in The New Yorker:

Donald J. Trump’s use of the name “Pocahontas” at a White House event honoring Navajo veterans was not a racial slur, a prominent white expert said on Monday.

“If some Native Americans were offended by the use of this term, I’m sorry that they’re so wrong,” the expert said. “As a white person, I think I’m in a better position to know about this stuff.”

An ad hominem fallacy fuels this satire, namely, that the one’s ethnicity (if white) a priori abnegates one’s ability to argue against POC Identity Politics grievance porn.

Sad!

Posted in Cultural Marxism, Left | Comments Off on The New Yorker: “Pocahontas” Not a Racial Slur, Says Prominent White Expert

An Israeli

Audacious Epigone poses a rhetorical question:

Q: What do you call someone who wants an ethnostate, a wall, and the mass deportation of illegal aliens living in the country?

A: An Israeli.

Posted in Immigration, Jewish | Comments Off on An Israeli

PKD: Electric Dreams

The sheer volume of quality content in this, the Third Golden Age of Television, is overwhelming. The British show Black Mirror, a modern update to The Twilight Zone (with self-contained episodes riffing on the theme of our enslavement to technology) is outstanding, and soon we’ll have Netflix giving us the promising new series Electric Dreams, which will be a series of self-contained episodes each based on a Philip K. Dick work:

Losing Charlie Brooker’s smash-hit dystopian drama Black Mirror to Netflix was a blow for Channel 4, but they haven’t waited too long to jump back on the sci-fi anthology horse.

Working with Amazon Prime Video and Sony Pictures Television, they’ve now developed 10-part series Philip K Dick’s Electric Dreams, a collection of one-off science fiction parables adapted from some of the author’s classic short stories, with a starry cast including Bryan Cranston, Steve Buscemi and Terrence Howard.

Breaking Bad’s Cranston also serves as executive producer, which is quite an ask for a show involving so many different writers and stories.

The story above provides synopses of each of the planned Electric Dreams episodes.

Posted in Literature, TV | Comments Off on PKD: Electric Dreams

The New Statesman: The Paranoias of White Identity Politics

In The New Statesman, Sophie McBain reviews two recent books on the Alt-Right — lt-America: The Rise of the Radical Right in the Age of Trump by David Neiwert and Making Sense of the Alt-Right by George Hawley — in a piece titled “The alt-right, and how the paranoias of white identity politics fuelled Trump’s rise”.

She begins her piece by comparing Alt-Righters with UFO cultists and the like:

Many Americans feel that their country and their livelihoods are being threatened by dark forces beyond their control. According to a 2013 survey conducted by Public Policy Polling, almost three in ten US voters believe that a globalist elite is conspiring to establish an authoritarian world government, or “New World Order”. The same poll found that over a third think that climate change is a hoax, 21 per cent believe that the government covered up a UFO crash in New Mexico in 1947 and 7 per cent believe that the first moon landing was faked.

Huh?

And it’s all downhill from here:

Later surveys suggest that Donald Trump voters may be more likely than others to place their faith in conspiracy theories of this kind. Polls conducted in 2016 found that two-thirds of Trump supporters believed that Barack Obama was a Muslim and 60 per cent thought that global warming was a myth. They are citizens of what the journalist David Neiwert calls “Alt-America” – “a mental space beyond fact or logic, where the rules of evidence are replaced by paranoia”. The inhabitants of Alt-America are overwhelmingly white, with better-than-average levels of income and education. Their distrust of the mainstream media and American establishment has rendered them oddly gullible, susceptible to believing any story that supports their world-view. The “beating heart” of Alt-America is white identity politics.

Well, at least she got one thing right: The average Alt-Righter is above average in both intelligence and income.

McBain better be careful: she may incur the wrath of SJWs who fear depictions of Alt-Right Nazi Monsters as average, well-functioning white people only serves to ‘normalize’ their Wicked Neo-Nazi Evil (e.g., libs freaking out over the NYT’s recent piece on Tony Hovater.)

Posted in Alt-Right, MSM | Comments Off on The New Statesman: The Paranoias of White Identity Politics

Jacobite: The Asymmetric Meme Warfare Of “It’s Ok To Be White”

In ‘The Asymmetric Meme Warfare Of “It’s Ok To Be White”’, Nathan Duffy provides a good analysis of why this particular meme resonates so deeply and has been such a success:

The memetic hivemind of the right-wing message board /pol/ recently found that magic touch, striking gold with their “It’s OK To Be White” meme. On the surface, this could be mistaken as a weak-kneed plea for tolerance. It’s only OK to be white? Something like “It’s Great to be White” would be more provocative, while not being any different from the ethnic pride afforded to minority groups, right?

But the gifted meme-makers peer beyond these shallow waters to greater depths. Not content to spread a viral “message,” they instead make the message an expected response in the real world. The more tame and inoffensive the message, they realized, the more absurd the outcry surrounding it would be.

Like the performance of some sort of digital Andy Kaufman, the final product isn’t the meme itself but the process of enveloping the audience in the act. It’s eliciting a second-order reaction: a response from normal people to the pearl-clutching of hall monitors. But how could anyone anticipate a freakout over a message as anodyne as “It’s OK To Be White”?

That is a matter of understanding the psychology of the of militant progressives intent on policing thoughtcrimes. Observing the usual pattern of responses to messages in public spaces containing the slightest departure from their approved orthodoxy, these intrepid memers figured out that anything that references whites while not being hostile to whites, anything benign, would be enough to trigger a hysterical response from many in this faction…

Scrolling through the hundreds of replies (many of which are from trolls themselves who know the plot and are part of the act, as it were, but also many that are not) one sees the ubiquitous response: “OK.. and? Is it not OK to be white?”

And there it is: a massive coup in the meme wars. The only winning defense strategy available here would have been to ignore the provocation, but these sorts are pathological and can’t help themselves. And the meme warriors knew this. What distinguishes this meme campaign, and other successful ones like it, from those that fall flat, is the precise insight into the enemy’s psychology and the ability to exploit it.

H.L. Mencken

But does such a brilliant meme campaign have any effect beyond making some manipulable foils look foolish and some laughs? It probably does. Given the scientific research in recent decades into cognitive biases and belief formation, doubt has been cast on the usefulness of reason in service of persuasion. We know that evidence and sound arguments aren’t particularly effective at changing hearts and minds. But a meme, or in this case a meme plus the tableaux created by the circumstances surrounding it, is not an argument per se. It has the capacity to be more visceral, less abstract, and thus more alluring and compelling…

While the Left still has many means of propaganda at its disposal—the universities, mainstream media, Hollywood—if they continue to lose the meme war to the jesters on the technological front, they are in for a bad time. As H.L. Mencken once put it, “one horse-laugh is worth ten-thousand syllogisms.”

Posted in Alt-Right, Anti-White, White Identity | Comments Off on Jacobite: The Asymmetric Meme Warfare Of “It’s Ok To Be White”

Rod Dreher on “The Nazi Next Door”

A couple of months ago, I wrote a piece for Counter-Currents on “The Red-Pilling of Rod Dreher”, as I find him a barometer of neo-liberal collapse, the pathological altruism of his Christian universalism slamming up against the hard surfaces of race realism and its manifestation in multiculturalism.

In “The Nazi Next Door”, the always panicky Dreher clasps his pearls about the recent NYT profile of Tony Hovater:

I remember years ago, after I was well into adulthood, learning from older people in my hometown the identities of some of the men who were Klansmen back in the 1950s and 1960s. I was shocked. “You mean Mr. ____ was a Klansman?! Really? He’s so sweet.” There were more than a few of these men — men I was raised to respect, and who I saw only as neighborly and, well, normal. But back in the day, they had put on white hoods, burned crosses, and heaven knows what else. That shook me up, realizing how very close evil was. A lot of Southerners my age and older can tell the same stories.

It’s 2017 and the guy still holds a cartoonish image of what the KKK in the ‘50s & ‘60s was really about.

Last night I was reading from a book about contemporary German history. The Nazis began as outsiders, as fringe figures. People seem to have this idea that grotesque evil is always something you can see coming from a mile away…

However, in fairness, I do concede that there is an unavoidable element of “normalizing” in any story a major media outlet like the NYT does on a fringe phenomenon. Media bias usually expresses itself not by media telling readers, viewers, and listeners what to think, but rather by framing the possibilities of what is acceptable thought. Liberals upset by the “neo-Nazi next door” piece are afraid that by paying attention to Hovater, and by presenting him in a neutral way, the Times is giving permission to others to consider him within the bounds of the normal.

Dreher likes to draw parallels between today’s western decadence with that of “Weimar” (he does it again in this article) but is saddened to see the rational reaction against this tide by vilified whites.

His BenOp solution is that we retreat to mountainside monasteries, eat fine food, drink fine wine, and discuss Aristotle, yet pretend we don’t see the implicit whiteness such a setting entails.

Posted in Alt-Right, Christianity | Comments Off on Rod Dreher on “The Nazi Next Door”

Stefan Molyneux vs. The Fascist

Stefan’s interlocutor (let’s call him The Fascist) gets the better of him on this one. Having been red-pilled in recent years, SM is struggling to preserve his anarcho-libertarian fetishization of individual ‘choice’, and the axiom of NAP, as the solution to the ills of post-modernity.

Listen to SM get testy. Listen to his response to The Fascist’s perfectly rational, trade-protectionist ‘Mexican corn’ example (39:00). Listen to SM’s promotion of job automation as a potential ‘solution’ to the corn example, and how he skirts the longterm consequences this approach entails.

Listen to SM mock The Fascist and then, some minutes later, get irate and accuse The Fascist of mocking him (43:00). Odd for someone who constantly cites psychological ‘projection’ as an operative dynamic in today’s cultural discourse.

Most unattractive is SM’s penchant for hurling his repeated, dismissive, ad hominem, “Have you ever owned a business? Well, until you have you don’t know what you’re talking about” jabs. This is disappointing, given that SM says he prizes reason and logic above all else.

I’m a fan of SM (as a polemicist from which to orient and hone one’s own position) but this was not one of his better moments.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DCQRcFNIG8

Posted in Alt-Right, Libertarianism | Comments Off on Stefan Molyneux vs. The Fascist

“Jewish Comedy: A Serious History” by Jeremy Dauber

Here’s the Amazon blurb for the new book Jewish Comedy: A Serious History (2017) by Jeremy Dauber, professor of Yiddish Language, Literature and Culture at Columbia University:

In a major work of scholarship both erudite and very funny, Columbia professor Jeremy Dauber traces the origins of Jewish comedy and its development from biblical times to the age of Twitter. Organizing the product of Jews’ comic imagination over continents and centuries into what he calls the seven strands of Jewish comedy―including the satirical, the witty, and the vulgar―he traces the ways Jewish comedy has mirrored, and sometimes even shaped, the course of Jewish history. Persecution, cultural assimilation, religious revival, diaspora, Zionism―all of these, and more, were grist for the Jewish comic mill; and Dauber’s book takes readers on the tour of the funny side of some very serious business. (And vice versa.)

In a work of dazzling scope, readers will encounter comic masterpieces here that range from Talmudic rabbi jokes to medieval skits, Yiddish satires and Borscht Belt routines to scenes from Seinfeld and Broad City, and the book of Esther to Adam Sandler’s “Hanukkah Song.” Dauber also explores the rise and fall of popular comic archetypes such as the Jewish mother, the Jewish American Princess, and the schlemiel, the schlimazel, and the schmuck, and the classic works of such masters of Jewish comedy as Sholem Aleichem, Isaac Babel, Franz Kafka, the Marx Brothers, Woody Allen, Joan Rivers, Philip Roth, Mel Brooks, Sarah Silverman, Jon Stewart, and Larry David, among many others.

Jewish comedy, as Dauber writes, is serious business. And precisely what it is, how it developed, and how its various strands weave together and in conversation with the Jewish story: that’s Jewish Comedy.

From the book’s Introduction:

The first time I walked into a Columbia University classroom to teach a course on Jewish comedy, Seinfeld had just gone off the air and Lena Dunham was entering high school. Judd Apatow was a respected television producer who no one outside the industry had ever heard of; and The Producers was still a movie, though there was talk of taking it to Broadway. I was a little nervous—a wet behind the ears twenty-seven-year-old assistant professor, lecturing to the largest class I’d ever had (apparently this was the kind of course that could attract a crowd), and I looked down at my notes to focus myself.

Jewish comedy is serious business, I’d typed across the top. And so it is.

Over the last fifteen years or so of teaching the subject, lots of things have changed—although, thanks to the magic of syndication, Seinfeld never really did go off the air—and my syllabus has changed with it; but the top line hasn’t, along with the two central realizations that accompanied it.

First: The story of Jewish comedy was almost as massive in scope, as meaningful in substance, as Jewish history itself. In fact, I realized as I refined and developed the class, I was looking at a tradition. One with a history that could, and should, be studied. The story of Jewish comedy—what Jewish humor did and meant for the Jews at different times and places as well as how, and why, it was so entertaining—is, if you tell it the right way, the story of American popular culture; it’s the story of Jewish civilization; it’s a guide to an essential aspect of human behavior. The fact that it also happens to be immensely entertaining to read, talk, and teach about is something of a bonus.

But second: You can’t include everything. Or even close. And so what you did include, I realized, had to work not just as a catalog of Jewish comedic production, but as an argument about what precisely Jewish comedy consists of. But even before you get to the cataloging and taxonomizing, there has to be some defining. Some inclusion and exclusion. Is the raw stuff of Jewish humor so capacious that it includes anything written by a Jew that might raise the faintest scintilla of a smile? Well, no. That would be, if not entirely ridiculous, at least ridiculously unhelpful. And literature is littered with brilliant comic thinkers who have warned against trying to define comedy too precisely: Samuel Johnson’s “Comedy has been unpropitious to definers” is the most famous, though I kind of prefer Swift’s rhyming couplet that “What Humour is, not all the tribe/ Of logic-mongers can describe.” But this logic-monger would like to set two conditions nonetheless.

First: Jewish humor has to be produced by Jews. Maybe this is obvious, maybe it isn’t, but it’s part of our ground rules. How someone defines their Jewishness is a notoriously tricky subject—and, counter to some people’s thinking, has been since the beginning of Jewish history—but anyone who defines themselves as Jewish in any way is potentially part of our subject; others, even if sometimes mistaken for Jews (Charlie Chaplin, looking at you), are out. This said, comedy—especially in performance media—is of course often collaborative, and oftentimes a great work of Jewish comedy is crafted in concert with non-Jews; this material is very much included.

The second, trickier condition: Jewish humor must have something to do with either contemporary Jewish living or historical Jewish existence. Jewish history is very long, and Jewish life extraordinarily diverse, both geographically and culturally. It would be surprising if all examples of Jewish comedy looked the same—and they certainly don’t. But all those different times and places featured Jews commenting on what it meant to be a Jew in that culture. Usually, since most of Jewish history is diasporic history, as some kind of cultural outsider; but even if not, almost inevitably with that sidelong, half-immersed half-alienated glance so crucial to comedy. And frequently, they used those comic instincts to participate in long-running discussions that crossed centuries and continents about the meaning of Jewish history, theology, and destiny. Some of the examples we’ll treat in this book are explicit about those discussions; some assign them to the spheres of subtext or allegory; some are snapshots of a lived present whose movement into the past render them part of the discussion despite their apparent intent. But they’re all grist for the mill: as opposed to, say, a killer knock-knock joke written by a Silverstein or a Schwartz. (Unless, I suppose, there’s some fairly potent allegorical or metaphorical component within.)

That’s it. Certain subthemes will emerge again and again across the varying strands, of course—a particular playfulness with language, especially befitting the changing linguistic (and frequently multilingual) circumstances in which Jews lived; a contemplation of power and the lack of it; the relation of those two themes to questions of masculinity, along with the presence and absence of female voices. But those are more provocative preoccupations rather than essential parts of the definition. That still leaves a tremendous amount to wrangle, though, and the solution I’ve come up with, the one that serves as the organizing structural principle of this book, follows the Maggid’s approach: Take a look at the long history of Jewish literature and culture, suss out the funny stuff that meets our definition, and then draw a defining circle around it—or, as I’m going to suggest, draw seven of them. Because, as it turns out, when you canvass the material—the entire breadth of the history of Jewish comedy, from the Bible to @crazyjewishmom’s Instagram account and look for commonalities, seven major conceptual rubrics—seven strands—suggest themselves.

Immediately, I hear the cry: “Why not eight? Why not six? Your seventh is really a modified version of number four!” Look, this isn’t a precise science; the writers and performers who produce this stuff aren’t theoretical constructs, they’re working artists trying to get a laugh and use multiple techniques at once; and comedy tends to blur boundaries anyway. So these are guidelines, ideal types.

And here they are, without further ado:

1.  Jewish comedy is a response to persecution and anti-Semitism.

2.  Jewish comedy is a satirical gaze at Jewish social and communal norms.

3.  Jewish comedy is bookish, witty, intellectual allusive play.

4.  Jewish comedy is vulgar, raunchy, and body-obsessed.

5.  Jewish comedy is mordant, ironic, and metaphysically oriented.

6.  Jewish comedy is focused on the folksy, everyday, quotidian Jew.

7.  Jewish comedy is about the blurred and ambiguous nature of Jewishness itself.

Posted in Culture, Humor, Jewish | Comments Off on “Jewish Comedy: A Serious History” by Jeremy Dauber

Trump Baits Pocahontas; She Bites

Trump trolling Fauxcahontas at an event honoring Native American Code Talkers is pure trolling gold.

“You were here long before any of us were here,” Trump said, standing beneath a portrait of former President Andrew Jackson. “Although we have a representative in Congress who they say was here a long time ago. They call her Pocahontas.”

Turning to the veterans, Trump said “but do you know what? I like you.”

The president made the remark in the Oval Office standing beside three Navajos who helped the U.S. Marine Corps develop a secret code during WWII.

What’s even better is that Warren took the bait:

“This was supposed to be an event to honor heroes, people who put it all on the line for our country,” Warren said later on MSNBC. “It is deeply unfortunate that the president of the United States can’t even make it through a ceremony honoring these heroes without throwing out a racial slur.”

Not to be outdone:

But Trump’s top spokeswoman defended his comment, saying “Pocahontas” is not a racial slur.

“I think what most people find offensive is Sen. Warren lying about her heritage to advance her career,” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters.

Posted in Democrat Party, Political Correctness, Republican Party | Comments Off on Trump Baits Pocahontas; She Bites