Militia Movement on Border

As the situation becomes more surreal, with illegals making demands directly in front of the WH (with no fear of arrest), we learn of what it will probably come down to: U.S. citizens (mainly whites) enforcing the border themselves, through militias, to stem the tide of Reconquista:

SAN ANTONIO – Photos showing dozens of members of the militia groups on the U.S.-Mexico border carrying semi-automatic rifles and wearing masks, camouflage and tactical gear provide one of the first glimpses into the group’s activities on the border.MilitiaTx

Members of the militia groups, who say they have 10 active “teams” along the state’s southern border, are seen at campsites, walking along the Rio Grande River, pointing rifles and pistols out of frame and flipping off the camera in the photos obtained by the San Antonio Express-News.

A spokesperson for the group provided the photos under the condition that members’ faces be blurred because of fear of being identified by “cartel and gang members.”

One of the photos shows a Border Patrol agent leaning through an armed militia member’s vehicle window and pointing on a map. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection earlier this month strongly rebuked the group’s presence on the border but did not return multiple requests for comment regarding the photo.

Gov. Rick Perry, who last week ordered 1,000 Texas National Guard members to the border, declined to comment specifically on the militia groups through a spokesman but said he is “leading to secure the border.”

The groups, including Oathkeepers, Three Percenters and Patriots, began recruiting and organizing more than a month ago, as national media outlets began focusing on an influx of Central American immigrants illegally crossing the border, including more than 50,000 unaccompanied minors.

Barbie Rogers, founder of the Patriots Information Hotline, which is helping organize and recruit for the militia groups, said there are 10 “operations on the ground along the Texas border” from El Paso to Laredo to the Rio Grande Valley. Many of the groups are stationed on ranch land with permission from the owners, she said.

Some Facebook comments from members of the militias indicate the groups are not fearful of using force.

“(Rules of Engagement) is if in fear of bodily injury, weapons free, if fired upon, return fire. Real simple,” member KC Massey posted along with a photo on Facebook. “We are not worried about an “International” incident if they shoot at us.”…

The Texas militia’s operation names, according to Rogers, are: Bolinas Border Patrol, Central Valley Militia, Independant Citizens Militia, Alpha Team, Bravo Team, FOB Harmony, Operation Secure Our Border: Laredo Sector, O’Shanessy’s Team, the 77′s and Camp Geronimo.

Rogers called on Perry to send 5,000 more National Guard members to the border and “if cost is an issue” to “call the militia. They will come if you call them.”

I can’t wait to hear comments about this from The Organizer, Nancy “baby Jesus” Pelosi, and Patrick “Holocaust analogy” Leahy. The story does contain one Dem’s comments:

State Sen. Leticia Van de Putte, D-San Antonio, denounced the militia groups in a statement, saying “pointing guns at children solves nothing.”…

Countdown to when Eric Holder will take action against them… begins now!

Posted in Immigration | Leave a comment

NYT on Stormfront

Writing in the NYT (what a surpise!), Seth Stephens-Davidowitz (ahem) temporarily leaves his urban cocoon (at least via his computer’s keyboard) and delves into the world of Stormfront.org, “America’s most popular online hate site” (“The Data of Hate“). Stephens-Davidowitz has a Ph.D. in economics from Harvard, so that means he’s really smart:

The white nationalist posters on Stormfront have issues with many different groups. They often write about crimes committed by African-Americans against whites; they complain about an “invasion” of Mexicans; and they love to mock gays and feminists. But their main problem appears to be with Jewish people, who are often described as super-powerful and clever — the driving force, generally speaking, behind the societal changes they do not like…

Stormfront members tend to be young, at least according to self-reported birth dates. The most common age at which people join the site is 19. And four times more 19-year-olds sign up than 40-year-olds. Internet and social network users lean young, but not nearly that young.

The states with the most members per capita are Montana, Alaska and Idaho. These states tend to be overwhelmingly white.

That the median age of Stormfront members is 19-ish I find interesting: I have noticed that younger generations may be increasingly rebelling against the forced scripture of the Church of Political Correctness and, with no mainstream outlet available to critique the Church (due to the leftist intolerance which the Church dispenses against thought-crimes), are therefore essentially forced to the only outlets available to them.

Stephens-Davidowitz is surprised to learn that the average Stormfront user is not a toothless redneck who never went to college:

The top reported interest of Stormfront members is “reading.” Most notably, Stormfront users are news and political junkies. One interesting data point here is the popularity of The New York Times among Stormfront users. According to the economists Matthew Gentzkow and Jesse M. Shapiro, when you compare Stormfront users to people who go to the Yahoo News site, it turns out that the Stormfront crowd is twice as likely to visit nytimes.com.

Perhaps it was my own naïveté, but I would have imagined white nationalists’ inhabiting a different universe from that of my friends and me. Instead, they have long threads praising “Breaking Bad” and discussing the comparative merits of online dating sites, like Plenty of Fish and OkCupid…

Some of this research adds to recent literature in the field that is frankly shocking and should change the way we think about hate.

I have noticed that liberals who bother to explore ‘white supremacy’ sites or groups for research purposes are often surprised to discover that the members are A) not ‘white supremacists’, B) have above average intelligence, and C) are courteous people.

Our cultural climate is such that any proactive discussions of white identity (e.g., discussing or promoting the collective interests of whites per the identity politics model; positive identification with one’s ancestry and their cultural achievements; etc.) are forced underground and kept behind closed doors, appearing only along the peripheries of ‘alternative right’ conservatism.

Sure, there are nutjobs amongst the lot. That is what happens when no other outlets of expression (in polite society) are allowed to exist. The venues are limited, so you get all types funneled into the mix.

Upon her study of the ‘white nationalism’ phenomenon’s more radical manifestations, Carol Swain, in her book The New White Nationalism in America: It’s Challenge To Integration (2002), sounds a warning bell to fellow liberals on the matter:

What makes some of the newer organizations and individuals in the white nationalist movement such a threat to racial harmony, I believe, is that they address many pressing issues of race and nationality that are usually ignored in more mainstream discourse. On sensitive issues of race, our public discourse has become so inhibited by norms of political correctness and racial taboos that many Americans – particularly white people – feel reluctant to express many of their deepest convictions and concerns…

The great danger here is that with few legitimate mainstream arenas in which to discuss some of their deepest anxieties and concerns, many people turn to white nationalist and white supremacist groups, whose Internet pages and chatboards may offer the only forum for candid discussions of race. It is only within such forums that many aggrieved whites feel comfortable sharing with one another the basis of their grievances. (Swain, p. 6)

Swain further argues that societal strictures against whites being able to collectively identify as whites be removed, and that the policies and premises of affirmative action be ended, in order to mitigate the unintended consequences of a growing silent resentment among whites.

It is important to again point out that white identity proponents are largely concerned with the collective interest of whites as whites (similar to other ethnic interest groups identifying collectively) and with the preservation of Anglo Saxon culture, and that coalescing around white identity is not equivalent or tantamount to espousing sentiments of racial superiority or supremacism. This is a point highlighted by Swain as well as by Dobratz & Shanks-Meile in their sociological study The White Separatist Movement in the United States: “White Power, White Pride!”(2000). Dobratz & Shanks, who are both Jewish and liberal, make it a point of noting how (suprisingly) intelligent, courteous and civil the ‘white nationalists’ they met were.

The Church of P.C. can bottle up white identity (as a salient feature of self-identity and group-identity) for only so long.

Sooner or later, the pressure builds up and releases.

Posted in Dark Enlightenment, White Identity | Leave a comment

Living in the Shadows – Pt. 2,193,775

Apparently, ‘living in the shadows’ includes shade from structures near the WH:

Illegal immigrants plan to picket the White House Monday afternoon, calling on fellow immigrant-rights advocacy groups to refuse to meet with the Obama administration until President Obama specifically includes illegal immigrants in any future meetings.

“We are among the millions of people who will either benefit or be harmed by the decisions the President makes, and we are here to represent ourselves in any future negotiations,” said Rosi Carrasco, one of organizers, in a statement announcing the action.

Posted in Immigration | Leave a comment

CoS: Camilla Andersson

Just another day in the annals of Scientology.

Posted in Scientology | Leave a comment

MacDonald on Žižek

Kevin MacDonald responds to the Žižek kerfuffle. MacDonald uses the opportunity to argue for the defensibility of not only his general thesis but the wider study of racial differences.

A must-read.

Posted in Jewish | Leave a comment

White Guilt vs. Jewish Guilt

Over the years, there have been some great nuggets that get to the heart of conservatism’s essence:

  • “The individual is foolish, but the species is wise.” – Edmund Burke
  • “From the crooked timber of humanity no truly straight thing can be made.” — Immanuel Kant
  • “Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains.” – attributed to Sir Winston Churchill
  • “A neoconservative is a liberal mugged by reality.” – Irving Kristol

In a recent post on the barebones Wikipedia entry on “Jewish guilt”, Steve Sailer repeats a line of his that ought to join the pantheon of conservative koans:

… “Jewish guilt” and “white guilt” never seem to be discussed simultaneously. As far as I can make out, “white guilt” is the worry that your ancestors were too ethnocentric, while “Jewish guilt” is the worry that you aren’t ethnocentric enough for your ancestors.

Posted in Jewish, White Identity | Leave a comment

JYT – 07_24_2014

It’s currently #7. Will it move up the ‘most emailed‘ chart? Stay tuned!

NYT_2014_07_24

Posted in Jewish, MSM | Leave a comment

Van Halen – Women In Love (1979)

I’ve recently been ‘rediscovering’ the genius that is (was?) Eddie Van Halen.

So, here we have not the obvious Roth-era masterworks:

  • Runnin’ With The Devil
  • Eruption
  • And the Cradle Will Rock
  • Everybody Wants Some
  • Mean Street
  • Unchained
  • Panama
  • Drop Dead Legs
  • Hot For Teacher

… but a lesser known song, “Women in Love“, from VH’s second album, Van Halen II.

The arpeggio intro, with prominent fret-harmonics, and which doesn’t appear to have any overdubs, is jaw-dropping. The song then kicks into gear with a variation of the opening melody, albeit structured into a harder, rock, block pattern.

When the hook/chorus comes in, one can only marvel at the majestic harmonies of Michael Anthony. (Why the f*ck did the weirded-out, manic VH brothers ever fire this guy?!)

Posted in Music | Leave a comment

The Data-Driven Home Search

As an organic secessionism takes place in America, with whites moving to increasingly white areas, such areas will prosper disproportionately. Then will come the backlash from non-white liberals about the ‘disparate impact’ such (natural and voluntary) racial/ethnic segregation entails. The NYT wrings its hands over new tools that exacerbate this coming secession (“The Data-Driven Home Search“). Hat tip: S. Sailer.

The article profiles various websites that are empowering individuals with more information about a town or neighborhood. Such sites are:

… part of a controversial industry trend that caters to home buyers who have both the desire and the ability to cherry-pick their surroundings. Other real estate websites are supplying home buyers with loads of hyper-specific community data, including racial makeup, percent of married households and education level. Because these sites, if not actually brokerages, are linked to home sales, they have attracted the attention of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which is charged with enforcing fair housing laws.

Aye, carumba! We mustn’t run afoul of HUD regulations and existing law which makes it illegal for a realtor to tell you the racial makeup of an area.

And while the notion of a “perfect” community may be a fantasy, research shows that people who move are increasingly drawn to places where they feel as if they belong, says Matt Motyl, a social psychologist and assistant professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

“One factor that plays into that is, ‘Do the people here look and talk like me?’ ” Mr. Motyl said…

Legal questions aside, the growing accessibility of so much demographic data has the potential to fuel the segregation that is already increasing along a number of lines — economically, racially, ideologically. Mr. Bishop, the author of “The Big Sort,” argues that as other forms of community have gone away or weakened, Americans are increasingly reordering themselves around shared values and areas of interest. “Given a choice,” he said, “people choose to segregate themselves into these places where they can surround themselves with people like themselves.

This self-segregating boosts people’s sense of well-being by satisfying the need to belong, says Mr. Motyl, who studies ideological migration.

Imagine that!

Hopefully, as individuals are increasingly able to learn dastardly facts like the demographics of a town, we can progressively ban such tools, for the greater good. After all, there are “thorny issues” involved here.

This trend raises some thorny questions. The growing accessibility of highly detailed demographic data plays into the natural tendency of home buyers to look for “people like us,” which is as old as the subdivided hills. Indeed, some suburban communities were created in the late 19th and early 20th centuries specifically with this in mind, some with discriminatory policies written into leases and deeds.

But Bill Bishop, a Texas journalist and the author of “The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart” (Houghton Mifflin, 2008), argues that this tribalism is a major driver of the country’s deepening political polarization. Over the last 30 years, he says, greater mobility, laws enforcing racial equity and prosperity have given Americans even more choice about where to live. Will Internet-enhanced abilities to scout out communities intensify that sorting effect?

And what about the impact on segregation? The National Association of Realtors’ code of ethics prohibits Realtors and associates involved in a sale from volunteering information regarding the racial, religious or ethnic composition of any neighborhood, lest they run afoul of the Fair Housing Act, which prohibits the steering of clients to or away from neighborhoods out of bias.  But many nonbrokerage real estate websites that act as referral generators for agents readily offer such information.

But, what about U.S. Census data, which contains much of the same information?

The sites are simply making it easier for home buyers to access data that is already available, much of it through the Census Bureau, says Peter Goldey, the chief information officer and chief knowledge officer for Onboard Informatics, a provider of local content data and lifestyle search products for real estate sites. “We think the consumer has a right to information as long as the information is factual,” he said.

Uh oh. Can we ban publication of U.S. Census data? Better get Pelosi on this… and HUD.

HUD may yet weigh in on the question. The department declined to make someone available for an interview, but in a prepared statement, Gustavo F. Velasquez, the assistant secretary for fair housing and equal opportunity, said: “We are aware of the issue and are reviewing it. It would be premature for us to comment while the review is underway.”

Posted in Secession | Leave a comment

Paris is Burning – Pt. 2,188

Paris is Burning (again) and our media isn’t covering it. Muslims (err… I mean ‘frenchmen’) are in the midst of yet another intifada in sectors of Paris.

Sarcelles

Posted in Europe, Immigration, Islam | Leave a comment